Objective: Contaminated duodenoscopes caused several hospital outbreaks. Despite efforts to reduce contamination rates, 15% of patient-ready duodenoscopes are still contaminated with gastrointestinal microorganisms. This study aimed to provide an overview of duodenoscope contamination over time, identify risk factors and study the effects of implemented interventions.

Design: Duodenoscope culture sets between March 2015 and June 2022 at a Dutch tertiary care centre were analysed. Contamination was defined as (1) the presence of microorganisms of oral or gastrointestinal origin (MGO) or (2) any other microorganism with ≥20 colony-forming units/20 mL (AM20). A logistic mixed effects model was used to identify risk factors and assess the effect of interventions, such as using duodenoscopes with disposable caps, replacing automated endoscope reprocessors (AER) and conducting audits in the endoscopy department.

Results: A total of 404 culture sets were analysed. The yearly contamination rate with MGO showed great variation, ranging from 14.3% to 47.5%. Contamination with AM20 increased up to 94.7% by 2022. For both MGO and AM20, the biopsy and suction channels were the most frequently contaminated duodenoscope components. The studied interventions, including audits, AER replacement and implementation of duodenoscopes with disposable caps, did not show a clear association with contamination rates.

Conclusion: Duodenoscope contamination remains a significant problem, with high contamination rates despite several interventions. Reprocessing the biopsy and suction channels is especially challenging. Changes in the design of reusable duodenoscopes, such as enabling sterilisation or easily replaceable channels, are necessary to facilitate effective duodenoscope reprocessing and to eliminate the risk of duodenoscope-associated infections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330355DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

duodenoscope contamination
12
contamination
9
tertiary care
8
contamination rates
8
identify risk
8
risk factors
8
culture sets
8
duodenoscopes disposable
8
disposable caps
8
biopsy suction
8

Similar Publications

Background And Aim: To reduce bacterial contamination after reprocessing, various new designs of duodenoscopes have been developed to better expose the elevator complex for cleaning. We compared the rates of bacterial contamination and organic residue in disposable distal cap duodenoscopes and detachable elevator duodenoscopes after manual cleaning and high-level disinfection (HLD), as well as their cost-effectiveness.

Methods: A total of 162 duodenoscopes were randomly assigned to either Group A (disposable distal caps; n = 81) or Group B (detachable elevator; n = 81).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite adherence to reprocessing protocols, duodenoscopes frequently remain contaminated, highlighting significant knowledge gaps in reprocessing efficiency.

Aim: To identify risk factors in duodenoscope reprocessing procedures affecting contamination rates.

Methods: Cultures from Pentax ED34-i10T2 duodenoscopes collected between February 2022 and December 2023 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study compares two methods for drying endoscopes after disinfection: a standard drying method (SD) using an endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) and a novel drying method (ND) using a special device with laminar and turbulent airflow.
  • Results showed that the ND was more effective, with no residual water left in endoscope channels compared to 90% in the SD group, and significantly less bacterial contamination after 14 days.
  • The ND also reduced drying time from over 16 minutes to under 6 minutes, highlighting its efficiency and potential as a better alternative for reprocessing flexible endoscopes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Periodic duodenoscope cultures are essential to timely detect contamination, but their sensitivity remains unknown. This study aims to determine the sensitivity of duodenoscope cultures and to estimate the prevalence of contaminated duodenoscope use.

Methods: We combined duodenoscope microbiologic surveillance data from March 2015 to June 2022 with usage data to evaluate patient exposure to duodenoscopes contaminated with microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Infection outbreaks associated with contaminated reusable duodenoscopes (RUDs) have induced the development of novel single-use duodenoscopes (SUDs). This study aimed to analyze the material composition and life cycle assessment (LCA) of RUDs and SUDs to assess the sustainability of global and partial SUD implementation.

Methods: A single-center study evaluated material composition analysis and LCA of one RUD and two SUDs from different manufacturers (A/B).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!