Introduction: Ultrasonography (USG) can be used in neonates to manipulate and place the umbilical catheter in the correct position. Although chest radiograph (CXR) is the gold standard, a noninvasive method like USG without radiation exposure may be an alternative bedside armamentarium to the clinician. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether USG-guided umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion is superior to the conventional method for the successful insertion of UVC.

Method: The neonates born between 25 and 42 weeks of gestation requiring parenteral fluids and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between September 2020 and November 2022 were randomized in two weight-based strata: ≤1,200 and >1,200 g. USG-guided UVC insertion was done in the intervention group and blind UVC insertion was done in the control group.

Results: Out of 112 enrolled neonates, 58 were in the USG-guided group and 54 in the blind group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the intervention and control groups (20% versus 29% [RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33]). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in locating tip position were 97 and 46.8%, respectively. The mean procedure time in USG and blind groups was 8.9 and 8.3 min, respectively ( value 0.56).

Conclusion: USG does not reduce the failure rates during the insertion of umbilical catheters. However, being a safe, noninvasive procedure, it can be considered a rescue modality to CXR in NICUs equipped with portable USG for guiding UVC insertion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764083PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000535096DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uvc insertion
16
umbilical venous
8
venous catheter
8
group blind
8
insertion
7
usg
6
comparison ultrasound-guided
4
umbilical
4
ultrasound-guided umbilical
4
catheter insertion
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Umbilical venous catheterization (UVC) is a common procedure for critically ill newborn infants. The insertion depth was estimated before the procedure using various formulae.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of five published formulae based on birth weight (BW).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare complications in neonates who had umbilical venous catheter (UVC) versus peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), percentage of non-elective removal of central catheters, and to compare complications of PICC in the upper limb compared with the lower limb.

Design: A prospective cross-sectional cohort study.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Prince Sultan Military Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are the standard of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to administer fluids, parenteral nutrition and medications, although complications may occur, including central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). However, the dwell time to reduce CLABSI risk remains an open issue.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of newborns hospitalized in the Modena NICU with at least one UVC inserted over a 6-year period (period 1: January 2011-December 2013; period 2: January 2019-December 2021).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the potential link between different types of central venous access (UVC vs. PICC) in preterm infants and the risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
  • Researchers used data from the Canadian Neonatal Network to compare three groups of preterm infants based on their initial vascular access methods: those with PICC, UVC, and UVC followed by PICC, totaling 497 infants.
  • The findings showed no significant association between the type of central venous access and NEC, but the authors suggest that more comprehensive prospective studies are necessary to further assess this relationship.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Neonates often require vascular access devices for medication or fluid therapy, but a third of devices fail before treatment completion or end with a complication. For adults and children, securing these devices with tissue adhesive (TA) increases the dwell and reduces complications. However, there is a lack of evidence for the neonatal population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!