Attitudes Toward Hysterectomy in Saudi Arabian Women Undergoing Evaluation for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background:  Hysterectomy is an effective management approach for uterovaginal prolapse. However, the decision to undergo hysterectomy is a complex matter, influenced not only by medical factors but also cultural beliefs, societal norms, and individual attitudes. In Saudi Arabia, a nation with its distinctive cultural and social norms, the understanding of women's attitudes toward hysterectomy is of utmost importance. Unfortunately, such related attitudes have not been explored.

Objective: This first-ever study aimed to investigate the attitudes toward hysterectomy among Saudi Arabian women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse, by exploring the factors influencing their decision-making process and treatment choices, with a particular focus on the potential impact of cultural beliefs and societal norms.

Methods: A survey was conducted among 404 women referred for uterovaginal prolapse evaluation. The participants completed a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic information, perceptions on hysterectomy's impact on well-being, and factors affecting decision-making.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation of participants was 51.07 ± 11.1 years. Most participants were currently married (n=327, 81%), were unemployed (n=309, 76.5%), and had an "excellent" self-rated general health status (n=138, 34%). Current prolapse management methods included Kegel exercises (n=103, 25.5%), pessary use (n=32, 8%), physical therapy (n=12, 3%), planned surgery (n=75, 18.5%), and no specific treatment (n=182, 45%). Overall, the study revealed diverse findings on the potential perceived impact of hysterectomy on different aspects of well-being. Notably, for pain symptoms, 152 participants (38%) reported potential improvement, while 123 participants (30%) predicted worsening, and 129 participants (32%) anticipated no change. Moreover, the study unveiled insights into the factors influencing patients' decision-making between hysterectomy and uterine-sparing procedures. Remarkably, 97 respondents (24%) considered the doctor's opinion to be "very Important," while 91 respondents (22%) rated the impact on surgical complication risk as "very important." Furthermore, the desire to preserve all healthy organs was deemed "very important" by 106 respondents (26%). The resources of information women depended on when making a decision to undergo hysterectomy varied and included a second opinion from another physician (n=68, 17%), social media (n=81, 20%), opinion from spouse/partner (21%), second opinion from female family members (n=99, 25%), and opinion from friends (n=70, 17%). Regarding preferences for decision-making, the responses varied substantially. Overall, 65 participants (16%) indicated a preference for their doctor to make the decision entirely, 81 participants (20%) preferred shared decision-making with their doctor, 89 participants (22%) wanted their doctor to make the decision after considering their input, 77 participants (19%) wished to make the final decision after discussing it with their doctor, and 93 participants (23%) expressed a preference for independently making the final decision. Lastly, correlations between women's responses and some demographic factors were identified.

Conclusion: This pioneering study provides valuable insights into Saudi Arabian women's attitudes toward hysterectomy, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care and culturally sensitive approaches in managing uterovaginal prolapse.