A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

What is the maximal timeframe between sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation, in different "culture" conditions? | LitMetric

Objective: Most of the literature about postmortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) deals with the controversies surrounding ethical and legal aspects, while the optimal time interval between the death and viable sperm acquisition is indefinite. In an attempt to aid fertility specialists, while counseling whether to pursue and adopt PMSR, we aim to explore the maximal time frame from ejaculated sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation in different "culture" conditions, observations that might be extrapolated to PMSR requests.

Patients And Methods: Five healthy men with normal semen analysis were enrolled. The sperm specimen from each man was diluted to 6.5 mL. After extracting 0.5 mL for cryopreservation, the remaining 6 mL were divided into three tubes: one was maintained in room temperature (23-25 °C), the second in an incubator (37 °C), and the third in a refrigerator (4 °C). Thereafter, every day, a 0.5 mL of each sample was extracted, examined, and cryopreserved. A week later, all the cryopreserved samples were thawed and tested for sperm motility and viability.

Results: While at room temperature, frozen/thawed sperm were still motile (6.5%) and viable (9.9%) up to 96 h; those maintained in the refrigerator, following freezing/thawing were immotile already at 48 h in culture, but still viable (6.0%) up to 72 h in culture. Those maintained in the incubator demonstrated the worse results with negligible motility (1.5%) and viability (3.7%) following freezing/thawing, already after 48 h in culture.

Conclusions: The timeframe cut-off between ejaculated sperm acquisition and cryopreservation should be 72 h, unless sperm was maintained at room temperature, where it might be longer. It would be prudent to check for sperm vitality prior to freezing in cases where only immotile sperms are present.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894794PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-03017-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sperm acquisition
16
sperm
12
room temperature
12
acquisition sperm
8
sperm cryopreservation
8
cryopreservation "culture"
8
ejaculated sperm
8
maintained room
8
maximal timeframe
4
timeframe sperm
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!