AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the effectiveness of fluorescent light energy (FLE), used to treat canine pyoderma, against antibiotic-resistant bacteria Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus aureus, as no prior in vitro studies exist.
  • - Researchers tested different treatment conditions, including blue light and FLE, on various isolates of S. pseudintermedius and S. aureus, but found no significant antibacterial effects across the treatments.
  • - Despite clinical reports of FLE's effectiveness in treating these infections in animals, the study concludes that its in vitro efficacy is not supported, suggesting a more complex interaction in live animals may contribute to its success.

Article Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and S. aureus are bacterial species of importance in veterinary medicine. The increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance necessitates the implementation of novel treatment modalities. Fluorescent light energy (FLE) is used as an adjunctive and primary treatment for canine pyoderma. However, no in vitro studies exist investigating its bactericidal effects against S. pseudintermedius or S. aureus.

Objectives: To determine the bactericidal effects of FLE on S. pseudintermedius and S. aureus isolates.

Materials And Methods: Two meticillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP) isolates, three meticillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) isolates and one meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolate were studied. A commercially available blue light-emitting diode (bLED) lamp and photoconverting hydrogel FLE system was used. All bacteria were exposed to five conditions following inoculation: (i) no treatment (control); (ii) blue light (bLED) once; (iii) bLED twice consecutively; (iv) FLE (bLED and photoconverting hydrogel) once; and (v) FLE (bLED and photoconverting hydrogel) twice consecutively. Each individual exposure was 2 min long.

Results: No statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for any treatment group when each bacterial isolate was evaluated individually, MSSP isolates were grouped, MRSP isolates were grouped, when all S. pseudintermedius isolates were combined, or when all isolates of both Staphylococcus species were combined.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: While clinical success is reported when using FLE to treat Staphylococcus infections in animals, no in vitro antibacterial efficacy was identified for S. pseudintermedius or S. aureus under experimental conditions. The clinical success observed with FLE may be the result of a more complex in vivo response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.13235DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bactericidal effects
12
photoconverting hydrogel
12
fluorescent light
8
light energy
8
staphylococcus pseudintermedius
8
pseudintermedius s aureus
8
hydrogel fle
8
fle bled
8
bled photoconverting
8
fle
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!