Prevalence of Dental Anomalies Among Orthodontic Patients: A Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Odontogenic anomalies encompass deviations in dental morphology, orientation, or spatial positioning within the mandibular structures. This study probed the frequency of such dental malformations among orthodontic patients receiving treatment in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the study sought to discern variations in the manifestation of these dental anomalies related to gender and nationality.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 384 panoramic radiographs belonging to orthodontic patients (comprising 222 males and 162 females) who sought treatment at orthodontic clinics of a privately owned university hospital in Riyadh City between 2017 and 2019. The patient records were scrutinized for various dental abnormalities, including but not limited to dilacerated teeth, supernumerary teeth, congenital absence of teeth, impactions, hyperdontia, hypodontia, taurodontism, tooth rotation, and amelogenesis imperfecta. The Chi-square test was employed to assess the correlation between the prevalence of dental anomalies and variables such as gender and nationality. A p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant for all tests.

Results: Among the assessed sample size of orthodontic patients, dental impactions emerged as the most prevalent dental anomaly, affecting 246 patients (64.1%). This was followed by the occurrence of supernumerary teeth in 31 patients (8.1%), hyperdontia in 29 patients (7.6%), and congenital absence of teeth in 28 patients (7.3%). Other less frequently observed dental irregularities included dilacerated teeth in 23 patients (6%), amelogenesis imperfecta in 12 patients (3.1%), taurodontism in 12 patients (3.1%), and tooth rotations in five patients (1.3%). A statistically significant gender-based disparity was observed, with dental impactions being more prevalent among males (n=154; 69.4%) than females (n=92; 56.8%). Conversely, supernumerary teeth were more prevalent among females (n=24; 14.8%) than males (n=7; 3.2%). No significant variation in the prevalence of dental anomalies was discernible across different nationalities.

Conclusion: Impactions and the presence of supernumerary teeth were the predominant dental anomalies detected among the studied orthodontic patient population. The prevalence of dental anomalies exhibited discernible variations based on gender but not nationality. These disparities could potentially influence orthodontic outcomes, underscoring the necessity for meticulous examination and tailored orthodontic treatment planning.