Understanding the social risk factor adjustment's effect on Star Ratings.

Am J Manag Care

RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90401. Email:

Published: December 2023

Objectives: CMS implemented the Categorical Adjustment Index (CAI) to address measurement bias in the Medicare Advantage (MA) Star Ratings, as unadjusted scores may disadvantage MA contracts serving more enrollees at greater social risk. CAI values are added to a contract's Star Ratings to adjust for the mean within-contract performance disparity associated with its percentage of enrollees with low socioeconomic status (ie, receipt of a Part D low-income subsidy or dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid [LIS/DE]) and who are disabled. We examined the CAI's effect on Star Ratings and the type of contracts affected.

Study Design: Observational study of MA contracts with health and prescription drug coverage.

Methods: We compared adjusted and unadjusted 2017-2020 Star Ratings overall and by contracts' proportion of LIS/DE and disabled enrollees. We assessed the CAI's effect on qualifying for quality bonus payments (QBPs), eligibility for rebate payments, and high-performing and low-performing designations.

Results: The CAI's impact was modest overall (3.2%-14.9% of contracts experienced one-half Star Rating changes). Upward changes were concentrated among contracts with high percentages of LIS/DE or disabled enrollees (7.7%-32.3% of these contracts saw increased Star Ratings). In 2020, 26.0% of contracts with a high proportion of LIS/DE or disabled enrollees that qualified for a QBP did so because of the CAI.

Conclusions: The CAI primarily affected contracts with high LIS/DE or disabled enrollment, which received higher Star Ratings because of the CAI. The adjustment helps ensure that such contracts' performance is not understated and reduces incentives for MA contracts to avoid patients at greater social risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2023.89471DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

star ratings
28
lis/de disabled
16
social risk
12
disabled enrollees
12
contracts high
12
contracts
9
star
8
greater social
8
proportion lis/de
8
ratings
7

Similar Publications

Context: Research shows hospice primary caregivers report better quality of care at Non-Profit (NP) than For-Profit (FP) hospices, but there is variation in quality across NP hospices.

Objective: Examine bereaved caregiver reports of the quality as a factor of whether NP hospices are part of an integrated healthcare system that included an acute care hospital.

Methods: Cross-sectional study of NP Hospices used star ratings and adjusted hospice composite quality scores May 2023 publicly data reported on the Care Compare website.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Star Ratings program incentivizes health plans in Medicare to improve performance on a variety of quality measures such as adherence to renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASAs). Adherence to RASA medications, defined as having a proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%, has been improving for several years, suggesting that further investigation is needed to assess the appropriateness of the current 80% PDC threshold for medication adherence as an indicator of quality. The 80% PDC threshold has been found to be associated with improved health care resource utilization outcomes; however, little evidence exists to show that this threshold is optimal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The majority of a health plan's performance and designated Star Rating is related to medication-related behavior, eg, medication adherence, medication review, and reconciliation, that are intricately related to adverse drug events (ADEs). Altered pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics owing to aging make older adults more vulnerable to ADEs like falls, fractures, hospitalizations, and mortality. Prevention of avoidable risk factors such as medication burden can help maintain quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rounded shapes are associated with softness and warmth, whereas Platonic solids are associated with hardness and coldness. We investigated the temperature-shape association through sensorial/conceptual qualities of geometric ice-like textured shapes. In Experiment 1, participants viewed symmetrical rotating 3D shapes (five Platonic solids-cube, tetrahedron, octahedron, icosahedron, dodecahedron; a star polyhedron and a sphere) and control shapes (naturalistic and angular), rating them in terms of liking, hardness, temperature, wetness, and texture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To quantify quality of care following an admission to a nursing home with low or high antipsychotic drug use.

Background: Misuse of antipsychotics in U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!