Prevalence of acquired and transmitted HIV drug resistance in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Infect Dis

HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, 7616911320, Iran.

Published: January 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine the prevalence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Iran, highlighting the lack of systematic reviews on this topic.
  • A meta-analysis included 22 studies, revealing a significant prevalence of acquired HIVDR among PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with rates of 34% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 27% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs).
  • The findings suggest that high levels of HIVDR exist both in treatment-experienced and treatment-naive PLHIV, emphasizing the need for universal pretreatment HIVDR testing and more frequent viral

Article Abstract

Background: There is no systematic review on the prevalence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in Iran. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of HIVDR among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Iran. We assessed HIVDR prevalence in antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve PLHIV (i.e., those without a history of ART) and PLHIV receiving ART.

Method: We systematically searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Iranian databases (Iranian Medical Research Information System, Magiran, and Scientific Information Database), the references of studies, and Google Scholar until March 2023. A random-effects model was used to calculate a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the prevalence of HIVDR in PLHIV.

Results: Among 461 potential publications, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of acquired HIVDR in PLHIV receiving ART was 34% (95% CI: 19, 50) for nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 27% (95% CI: 15, 41) for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and 9% (95% CI: 3, 18) for protease inhibitors (PIs). The pooled prevalence of acquired HIVDR in treatment failure PLHIV was 50% (95% CI: 31, 69) for NRTIs, 49% (95% CI: 29, 69) for NNRTIs, 11% (95% CI: 2, 24) for PIs, and 1% (95% CI: 0, 4) for integrase inhibitors (INIs). The pooled prevalence of transmitted HIVDR in ART-naïve people was 3% (95% CI; 1, 6) for NRTIs, 5% (95% CI: 2, 9) for NNRTIs, and 0 for PIs and INIs.

Conclusion: The prevalence of HIVDR was relatively high in both ART-naïve PLHIV and those receiving ART. Without universal pretreatment HIVDR testing and more frequent routine HIV viral load testing among PLHIV who are on ART, the HIVDR prevalence might increase in PLHIV in Iran.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763184PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08916-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prevalence acquired
12
prevalence hivdr
12
plhiv receiving
12
pooled prevalence
12
95%
11
prevalence
10
hivdr
10
hiv drug
8
drug resistance
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!