Development of Drug Products for the Treatment of Acute Radiation Syndrome.

The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval to market drug products for use as medical countermeasures, to prevent or mitigate injury caused by various threat agents, is commonly based on evidence of efficacy obtained in animals. Animal studies are necessary when human studies are not feasible and challenge studies are not ethical. The successful development of countermeasures to radio-nuclear threats that cause Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) provides the opportunity to explore potential areas of overlap in the scientific approaches to studies of injuries caused by radiation and sulfur mustard exposures in animals. The aim is to evaluate the available scientific knowledge for radiation threat agents and sulfur mustard for potential analogies of fundamental mechanisms of organ injury and dysfunction. This evaluation is needed to determine the applicability of regulatory strategies for product development and approval adopted by manufacturers of countermeasures for radiation threat agents. Key elements of an efficient development plan based on animal efficacy studies include characterizing the pathophysiology of organ injury and the mechanism of action (MOA) of the countermeasure; modeling the clinical condition in animals to establish the manifestations of the injury caused by various levels of exposures to the threat agent and the response to various doses of the countermeasure candidate; as well as selecting a maximally effective human dose.