In the UK, there are a variety of religious or cultural beliefs and preferences that guide people in a range of lifestyle decisions. This qualitative study aimed to better understand the views of the public around prescribing animal-derived products, in particular low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), from a potential patient perspective. A series of quality improvement focus groups with stakeholders were undertaken to understand perceptions and to evaluate and inform an established treatment pathway. Stakeholders discussed finding out about the porcine nature of LMWH asking 'Why don't they tell us?', suggesting that they 'shouldn't have to give out clues' about their personal preferences. Participants' thoughts about 'how' information be provided, by 'whom' and 'when' were gained. The stakeholders indicated that current practice is unacceptable for patients. They require greater knowledge and transparency regarding product components and recommend that healthcare professionals provide more dialogue and choice to patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753222 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2023-0005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!