Background: First tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a common procedure performed by podiatrists and orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate on how useful CT scans are in assessing fusion status in the post-operative patient. The purpose of our study was to determine the reliability among both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists in reviewing both postoperative radiographs and CT in order to determine if fusion had occurred in patients undergoing 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine if CT offered improved inter- and intra-rater reliability when compared to plain radiographs.
Methods: Patients who underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed and those who underwent CT post-operatively for persistent pain were identified. Orthopedic surgeons and radiologists then analyzed the radiographs and CT of these patients for union with a threshold for union being set at 50% of the joint being fused. Imaging was then re-evaluated by the same provider 6 months later.
Results: 24 patients were identified meeting inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability for assessment of 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis were better with CT compared to radiographs; however, this association was not deemed reliable. Both imaging modalities were not able to assess union status confidently and reliably across reviewers, although CT scan had better intra-rater reliability.
Conclusions: While CT is frequently used to assess fusion in patients who have underwent 1st tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, it was not found to be better than radiographs. Practitioners should reconsider the use CT as the gold standard when assessing fusion in this population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754801 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-01033-y | DOI Listing |
J Foot Ankle Surg
January 2025
Surgical Fellow, Florida Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center Fellowship, 5741 Bee Ridge Rd #490, Sarasota, FL 34233. Electronic address:
Joint arthrodesis is a very common surgical approach in foot and ankle surgery at various anatomic levels. Several techniques have demonstrated the ability to provide successful fusion with appropriate preparation of the joint in question. With that in mind, the joint preparation, regardless of approach or instrumentation, is consistently the most time-consuming.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFoot (Edinb)
March 2024
Guy's and St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kings College University of London, London, UK. Electronic address:
Indian J Orthop
January 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655 USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
November 2023
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Acta Orthop
July 2023
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Background And Purpose: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA).
Patients And Methods: 8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!