A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Establishment and evaluation of an improved rat model of open abdomen. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study aimed to create an animal model for open abdomen (OA) using different closure techniques in rats to mimic postoperative conditions.
  • - Three groups of male rats were compared: one with just polypropylene mesh, one with mesh and a patch, and one with mesh plus a sutured patch, with their survival rates and healing processes monitored over a week.
  • - The findings indicated that while survival rates were similar, the group with the mesh and patch showed better wound healing and overall condition, making it the best technique for simulating OA for research.

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to establish an animal model of open abdomen (OA) through temporary abdominal closure via different techniques.

Methods: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: group A (OA with polypropylene mesh alone); group B (OA with polypropylene mesh combined with a patch); and group C (OA with polypropylene mesh and a sutured patch). Vital signs, pathophysiological changes, and survival rates were closely monitored in the rats for 7 days after surgery. Abdominal X-rays and histopathological examinations were performed to assess abdominal organ changes and wound healing.

Results: The results showed no significant difference in mortality rates among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, rats in group B exhibited superior overall condition, cleaner wounds, and a higher rate of wound healing compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Abdominal X-rays indicated that varying degrees of distal intestinal obstruction in all groups. Histopathological examinations revealed fibrous hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, neovascularization, and collagen deposition in all groups. Group B demonstrated enhanced granulation tissue generation, neovascularization, and collagen deposition compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Polypropylene mesh combined with patches is the most suitable method for establishing an animal model of OA. This model successfully replicated the pathological and physiological changes in postoperative patients with OA, specifically the progress of abdominal skin wound healing. It provides a practical and reliable animal model for OA research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369015PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12376DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group polypropylene
12
polypropylene mesh
12
model open
8
open abdomen
8
three groups
8
establishment evaluation
4
evaluation improved
4
improved rat
4
rat model
4
abdomen introduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!