AI Article Synopsis
- The current evidence on using artificial intelligence (AI) for identifying dental implant systems is inconclusive due to varying methodologies and results in existing studies.
- A systematic review was conducted analyzing studies from major databases to evaluate the accuracy of AI diagnostic tools in classifying dental implants compared to expert judgments.
- The review included 22 articles and found that AI accurately identified dental implants with an overall accuracy of 92.56%, although some studies exhibited risks of bias, highlighting the need for more robust research in this area.
Article Abstract
Statement Of Problem: The evidence regarding the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in identifying dental implant systems is currently inconclusive. The available studies present varying results and methodologies, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to comprehensively analyze and evaluate articles that investigate the application of AI in identifying and classifying dental implant systems.
Material And Methods: An electronic systematic review was conducted across 3 databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus. Additionally, a manual search was performed. The inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed studies investigating the accuracy of AI-based diagnostic tools on dental radiographs for identifying and classifying dental implant systems and comparing the results with those obtained by expert judges using manual techniques-the search strategy encompassed articles published until September 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of included articles.
Results: Twenty-two eligible articles were included in this review. These articles described the use of AI in detecting dental implants through conventional radiographs. The pooled data showed that dental implant identification had an overall accuracy of 92.56% (range 90.49% to 94.63%). Eleven studies showed a low risk of bias, 6 demonstrated some concern risk, and 5 showed a high risk of bias.
Conclusions: AI models using panoramic and periapical radiographs can accurately identify and categorize dental implant systems. However, additional well-conducted research is recommended to identify the most common implant systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.027 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Impact of Two Flap Advancement Techniques and Periosteal Suturing on Graft Displacement During Guided Bone Regeneration.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
February 2025
Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Objectives: This preclinical ex vivo porcine study aimed to evaluate the effects of two flap advancement techniques and periosteal suturing (PS) on graft material displacement during primary wound closure in guided bone regeneration (GBR). Secondary objectives included assessing flap advancement and the impact of soft tissue characteristics on graft displacement.
Materials And Methods: Standardized two-walled horizontal bone defects were created in second premolar sites of pig hemimandibles.
The clinical effect of bone perforations in periodontal regeneration and alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
Division of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Objectives: The present systematic review aimed to evaluate if cortical bone perforation is effective in enhancing periodontal surgery and guided bone regeneration (GBR) in humans.
Materials And Methods: Electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 31st, 2023. Grey literature was also searched.
Validation of mixed reality in planning orbital reconstruction with patient-specific implants.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the usability and performance of mixed reality (MR) technology versus conventional methods for preoperative planning of patient-specific reconstruction plates for orbital fractures. A crossover study design was used to compare MR technology with conventional three-dimensional (3D) printing approaches in the planning of maxillofacial traumatology treatments. The primary focus was on user-friendliness and the accuracy of patient-specific reconstruction planning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the association between the number of medications and oral functions in university hospital outpatients.
J Oral Sci
January 2025
Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the number of medications and oral functions.
Methods: The study participants were selected from individuals who were attending regular follow-up as hospital outpatients. Patient profiles, the number of medications used, and measured values of oral function were extracted.
Synergistic enhancement of angiogenesis and osseointegration in 3D-printed porous polyetheretherketone scaffolds using biomimetic coatings of bone morphogenetic protein-2/fibronectin.
Int J Biol Macromol
January 2025
Department of Stomatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China. Electronic address:
This study explored a novel modification method for porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants using a biomimetic coating to achieve synergistic enhancement of vascularization and bone regeneration. Inspired by the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) structure (consists of growth factors and matrix proteins), a biomimetic dual-factor coating capable of releasing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and fibronectin (FN) was coated on the surface of 3D-printed porous PEEK scaffolds using polydopamine (PDA) as a binder. Experiments conducted with MC3T3-E1 cells or HUVECs in co-culture with scaffolds revealed that the biomimetic coating not only synergically promoted cell migration, adhesion and proliferation, but also enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenic differentiation simultaneously in vivo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!