Purpose: Local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) are challenging for salvage treatment. Retrospective analysis of own experiences with salvage re-irradiation was performed.
Methods: The study included all consecutive patients treated with salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for prostate bed recurrence following RP and postoperative RT at a single tertiary center between 2014 and 2021. Treatment toxicity defined as the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 genito-urinary (GU) or gastro-intestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) was assessed. A PSA response, biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated.
Results: The study group included 32 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median follow-up of 41 months, treated with CyberKnife (53%) or Linac (47%) sSBRT. Total dose of 33.75-36.25 Gy in five fractions (72%) was applied in the majority of them. Approximately 19% patients reported grade ≥ 2 GU AEs both at baseline and at three months, and grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity increased from 0% at baseline to 6% at three months after sSBRT. There was some clinically relevant increase in late toxicity with 31% patients reporting late ≥ 2 GU, and 12.5% late ≥ 2 GI AEs. Two grade 3 AEs were recorded: recto-urinary fistulas. The majority of patients showed a PSA response (91% at one year post-sSBRT). The 3‑year BC was 40% and 3‑year OS was 87%.
Conclusions: Manageable toxicity profile and satisfactory biochemical response suggest that SBRT in patients with local recurrence following RP and postoperative RT might be a salvage option for selected patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10876733 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02187-2 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
January 2025
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Introduction: Patient engagement is continuously being promoted by patients as well as politicians and healthcare professionals. One way of increasing patient engagement is by using shared decision-making (SDM), which is a joint effort of clinicians and patients making decisions together.When planning stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for a lung tumour located close to the thoracic wall, there are conflicting interests between (1) delivering the highest possible dose to obtain local tumour control and (2) reducing the dose to the thoracic wall to decrease the risk of chest wall pain and rib fractures following treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransl Lung Cancer Res
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is crucial for treating early-stage inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its precision and high-dose delivery. This study aimed to investigate the dosimetric deviations in gated (GR) versus non-gated radiotherapy (NGR), analyzing the impact of tumor location, target volume, and tumor motion range on dose distribution accuracy.
Methods: Sixty patients treated with either gated (n=30) or non-gated (n=30) SBRT for early-stage NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed.
Phys Med
January 2025
University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy.
Purpose: Automatic planning (AP) has been compared to manual planning (MP) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to validate the former and to implement it in clinical practice.
Methods: A new developing Guided Planning System (GPS) engine was used to reoptimize 20 lung SBRT plans with the RayStation™ treatment planning system (TPS). The original manual plans were optimized to deliver 60 Gy in 5 or 8 fractions to the target with constraints on organs at risk (OARs) based on an internal protocol.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
February 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Appl Clin Med Phys
January 2025
Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Various methods exist to correct for intrafraction motion (IFM) of the prostate during radiotherapy. We sought to characterize setup corrections in our practice informed by the TrueBeam Advanced imaging package, and analyze factors associated with IFM.
Methods: 132 men received radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a volumetric modulated arc therapy technique.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!