Objective: Currently, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer cells are diagnosed under the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2018 guidelines. The guideline combined the results of in situ hybridization (DISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques. The IHC technique is easy, cheap, and suitable for developing country. Therefore, in this study, we validated the use of IHC alone compared to the results of HER2 amplification under ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines in diagnosed HER2 positive breast cancer cells.
Methods: A total of 510 breast cancer tissue samples from Rajavithi Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, from January 1st, 2022, to May 31st, 2023, were analyzed by IHC, followed by dual ISH (DISH). We selected 58 samples of IHC equivocal (score 2+) and 98 samples of IHC positive (score 3+) to analyze the diagnostic values by comparing them to the results of HER2 amplification.
Results: The HER2 IHC score was found to agree with HER2 amplification with a sensitivity of 87.96%, a specificity of 93.75%, a positive predictive value of 96.94%, a negative predictive value of 77.59%, a positive likelihood ratio of 14.07, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.13, and an accuracy of 89.74%.
Conclusion: The promising outcomes suggest that a positive IHC test result (score 3+) could potentially stand alone for patients with breast cancer undergoing anti-HER2 treatment, even without DISH confirmation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909106 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4321 | DOI Listing |
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Young Academy of Gynecologic Oncology (JAGO), Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (NOGGO), Berlin, Germany.
Background: The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into routine gynecologic cancer treatment requires a thorough understanding of how to manage immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to ensure patient safety. However, reports on real-world clinical experience in the management of ICIs in gynecologic oncology are very limited. The aim of this survey was to provide a real-world overview of the experiences and the current state of irAE management of ICIs in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
January 2025
Division de la Recherche Clinique, Centre Jean PERRIN, 58 rue Montalembert, Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France.
Background: Over the past twenty years, the post-cancer rehabilitation has been developed, usually in a hospital setting. Although this allows better care organization and improved security, it is perceived as stressful and restrictive by the "cancer survivor". Therefore, the transfer of benefits to everyday life is more difficult, or even uncertain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBreast Cancer
January 2025
Tepe Prime, MKA Breast Cancer Clinic, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
January 2025
Google Health, 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA.
Purpose: Many breast centers are unable to provide immediate results at the time of screening mammography which results in delayed patient care. Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) could identify patients who may have breast cancer and accelerate the time to diagnostic imaging and biopsy diagnosis.
Methods: In this prospective randomized, unblinded, controlled implementation study we enrolled 1000 screening participants between March 2021 and May 2022.
Mol Biol Rep
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Background: The identification of circulating potential biomarkers may help earlier diagnosis of breast cancer, which is critical for effective treatment and better disease outcomes. We aimed to study the role of circ-FAF1 as a diagnostic biomarker in female breast cancer using peripheral blood samples of these patients, and to investigate the relation between circ-FAF1 and different clinicopathological features of the included patients.
Methods And Results: This case-control study enrolled 60 female breast cancer patients and 60 age-matched healthy control subjects.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!