PET/CT Reconstruction and Its Impact on [Measures of] Metabolic Tumor Volume.

Acad Radiol

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.).

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in oncological imaging, specifically looking at its effectiveness in Hodgkin lymphoma patients using ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT scans.
  • Two methods of measuring MTV were evaluated: a fixed threshold (MTV4.0) and an adaptive threshold (MTV41%), comparing their consistency across different imaging methods.
  • Results indicate that MTV4.0 is more reliable across various reconstruction settings, while MTV41% showed greater variability, suggesting that MTV4.0 is better suited for clinical practice and multicenter studies.

Article Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: In oncological imaging, the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for further prognostic differentiation and the development of risk adapted strategies appears promising. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT reconstructions for their potential impact on different methods of MTV measurement.

Materials And Methods: We analyzed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of 40 Hodgkin lymphoma patients before first-line treatment who had undergone fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. The MTVs were determined taking an SUV of 4.0 (MTV4.0) as a fixed threshold or 41% of the single hottest voxel (MTV41%) as an adaptive threshold for automated lymphoma delineation in both UHD and OSEM reconstructions. We then compared the absolute and relative differences between MTV4.0 and MTV41% in UHD and OSEM reconstructions. The relative distribution of MTV4.0 and MTV41% in relation to the reconstruction method applied was recorded and respective differences were tested for statistical significance using the paired sample t-test.

Results: A comparison of MTV4.0 and MTV41% showed smaller relative and absolute differences in MTV between different reconstruction settings for the MTV4.0 method. Conversely, the absolute as well as the relative differences between MTVs obtained from different reconstructions settings were significantly greater when the MTV41% method was applied (p < 0001).

Conclusion: MTV4.0 brings higher robustness between different reconstruction settings, while with MTV41% the deviation between volumes obtained with different reconstruction settings is greater. For clinical routine and for multicenter settings, the MTV4.0 therefore appears most promising.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mtv40 mtv41%
12
metabolic tumor
8
tumor volume
8
uhd osem
8
osem reconstructions
8
relative differences
8
method applied
8
mtv40
5
mtv41%
5
pet/ct
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!