Importance: Brain health is most likely compromised after hospitalization for COVID-19; however, long-term prospective investigations with matched control cohorts and face-to-face assessments are lacking.

Objective: To assess whether long-term cognitive, psychiatric, or neurological complications among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 differ from those among patients hospitalized for other medical conditions of similar severity and from healthy controls.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This prospective cohort study with matched controls was conducted at 2 academic hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. The case cohort comprised patients with COVID-19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Control cohorts consisted of patients hospitalized for pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or non-COVID-19 intensive care-requiring illness between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, and healthy age- and sex-matched individuals. The follow-up period was 18 months; participants were evaluated between November 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023.

Exposures: Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was overall cognition, assessed by the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes were executive function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and neurological deficits.

Results: The study included 345 participants, including 120 patients with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [14.4] years; 70 men [58.3%]), 125 hospitalized controls (mean [SD] age, 66.0 [12.0] years; 73 men [58.4%]), and 100 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [15.3] years; 46 men [46.0%]). Patients with COVID-19 had worse cognitive status than healthy controls (estimated mean SCIP score, 59.0 [95% CI, 56.9-61.2] vs 68.8 [95% CI, 66.2-71.5]; estimated mean MoCA score, 26.5 [95% CI, 26.0-27.0] vs 28.2 [95% CI, 27.8-28.6]), but not hospitalized controls (mean SCIP score, 61.6 [95% CI, 59.1-64.1]; mean MoCA score, 27.2 [95% CI, 26.8-27.7]). Patients with COVID-19 also performed worse than healthy controls during all other psychiatric and neurological assessments. However, except for executive dysfunction (Trail Making Test Part B; relative mean difference, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.01-1.31]), the brain health of patients with COVID-19 was not more impaired than among hospitalized control patients. These results remained consistent across various sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions And Relevance: This prospective cohort study suggests that post-COVID-19 brain health was impaired but, overall, no more than the brain health of patients from 3 non-COVID-19 cohorts of comparable disease severity. Long-term associations with brain health might not be specific to COVID-19 but associated with overall illness severity and hospitalization. This information is important for putting understandable concerns about brain health after COVID-19 into perspective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10755623PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49659DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain health
28
patients covid-19
20
patients hospitalized
12
[sd] age
12
years men
12
healthy controls
12
covid-19
10
patients
10
health covid-19
8
pneumonia myocardial
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A study evaluated the impacts of divalproex sodium on brain volumes in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease using MRI scans over 24 months.
  • The results indicated that participants receiving divalproex experienced a significantly higher decline in hippocampal and brain volumes compared to those on placebo, along with a faster decline in cognitive function as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination.
  • The findings suggest that divalproex treatment is linked to accelerated brain volume loss and potentially increased cognitive impairment, although the long-term effects remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study tested whether divalproex sodium (valproate) could prevent or delay agitation and psychosis in individuals with moderate Alzheimer's disease, enrolling 313 participants.
  • After two years of treatment, results showed no significant difference between the valproate and placebo groups regarding the time to development of agitation or psychosis.
  • Additionally, the valproate group experienced more side effects and showed greater reductions in brain volume, indicating potential adverse effects of the treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To delineate the trajectories of Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) uptake using positron emission tomography, and hippocampal volume using magnetic resonance imaging and their relative associations with cognitive change at different stages in aging and Alzheimer disease (AD).

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: The 59 study sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!