Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Unlabelled: Acalvaria is a rare congenital malformation characterized by the absence of bones and related muscles in a section of the skull. The number of reported cases in the literature is quite low, and it is generally considered a fatal malformation. We present a case of a newborn diagnosed with acalvaria malformation along with a review of the literature, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing this rare condition from malformations such as anencephaly, exencephaly and acrania.
Introduction: The clinical landscape of acalvaria is scarcely populated, with the malformation often signifying a dire prognosis. Despite the embryological origin and pathogenesis remaining largely enigmatic, it has critical implications for the prenatal and postnatal therapeutic strategies. We investigate a case coupled with a comprehensive literary review to present a clearer clinical portrait and advance the alertness about this lethal anomaly among healthcare providers.
Discussion: The rarity of acalvaria constrains the establishment of a definitive incidence rate or a standardized treatment protocol. Varied associations with other neurological and systemic anomalies pose a significant ambiguity regarding its etiopathogenesis. Differential diagnosis remains intricate, relying on nuanced ultrasonographic examinations and an informed interpretation of embryological developments.
Conclusion: Through our report of an acalvaria-affected newborn undetectable in prenatal ultrasound, we highlight the implications of rarity - the obstacle in uniform diagnosis and the resultant therapeutic challenge. The discussion fosters a need for heightened awareness and consolidating case reports to nurture clinical consensus. Furthermore, it underscores the necessity for multifaceted research efforts towards understanding etiology and optimizing treatment modalities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06266-8 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!