Importance: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is an invaluable and widely used resource for cancer research, but the current state of representation of different racial and ethnic groups compared with the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) database is unknown.

Objective: To examine whether Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals have lower representation in the NCDB compared with the USCS database.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study assessed individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, and January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, in the NCDB and USCS databases. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to October 2023.

Exposure: Time.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was the absolute percentage change (APC) in capture rate across the study period.

Results: The cohort included 5 175 007 individuals (0.50% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.10% Asian or Pacific Islander, 12.01% Black, 6.58% Hispanic, and 77.81% White) who were diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Capture rates were the lowest for individuals who were Hispanic (40.83% in 2004-2006 and 54.75% in 2017-2019; P < .001) or American Indian or Alaska Native (20.72% in 2004-2006 and 41.41% in 2017-2019; P < .001). The APCs were positive for both racial categories across all 4 cancers. However, overall APCs for Hispanic individuals (13.92%) remained lower than the overall APCs of White individuals (22.23%; P < .001). The APCs were greater for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals than for White individuals for prostate (14.68% vs 11.57%) and breast (21.61% vs 17.90%) cancer (P < .001), but the APCs for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals were lower than for White individuals for lung cancer (24.54% vs 33.03%; P < .001).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals diagnosed with cancer in the NCDB, Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer were undercaptured in the NCDB, but their representation improved over time. Increased study is needed to determine where these populations predominantly seek cancer care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753391PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50237DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

capture rates
8
national cancer
8
cancer database
8
american indian
8
indian alaska
8
alaska native
8
diagnosed breast
8
breast colorectal
8
colorectal lung
8
lung prostate
8

Similar Publications

Integrating climate and physical constraints into assessments of net capture from direct air capture facilities.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

January 2025

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.

Limiting climate change to targets enshrined in the Paris Agreement will require both deep decarbonization of the energy system and the deployment of carbon dioxide removal at potentially large scale (gigatons of annual removal). Nations are pursuing direct air capture to compensate for inertia in the expansion of low-carbon energy systems, decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors, and address legacy emissions. Global assessments of this technology have failed to integrate factors that affect net capture and removal cost, including ambient conditions like temperature and humidity, as well as emission factors of electricity and natural gas systems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Xylosandrus crassiusculus Motschulsky and Xylosandrus germanus Blandford are serious ambrosia beetle pests in ornamental nurseries. Three ethanol baits, AgBio low release (LR), AgBio high release (HR), and Trécé are commercially available for use in bottle traps to determine flight activity of adult Xylosandrus spp. However, release patterns of ethanol from these baits under varying temperatures and captures of Xylosandrus spp.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Financial toxicity is the detrimental impact of health care costs that must be mitigated to achieve universal health coverage. Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) is widely used to measure financial toxicity but does not capture patient perspectives of unaffordable health care costs. Financial hardship (FH), a patient-reported outcome measure, is currently underutilized but may be an important adjunct metric.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Understanding the relationship between non-communicable diseases (NCDs), obesity, and health expenditure is crucial for developing effective public health policies, particularly in light of the rising global burden of NCDs and obesity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between NCDs, obesity, and health expenditure in Turkiye.

Methods: Data were collected from the World Health Organization and Our World in Data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Measuring lower extremity impact acceleration is a common strategy to identify runners with increased injury risk. However, existing axial peak tibial acceleration (PTA) thresholds for determining high-impact runners typically rely on small samples or fixed running speeds. This study aimed to describe the distribution of axial PTA among runners at their preferred running speed, determine an appropriate adjustment for investigating impact magnitude at different speeds, and compare biomechanics between runners classified by impact magnitude.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!