AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the image quality of low-dose temporal bone CT scans in patients with otitis media and mastoiditis using deep learning reconstruction (DLR).
  • A total of 97 temporal bones from 53 patients were analyzed, comparing high-resolution CT with low-dose scans reconstructed using varying levels of DLR.
  • Results showed that while DLR methods produced less image noise and higher signal-to-noise ratios, subjective image quality varied, with some DLR methods performing worse than traditional high-resolution scans in specific anatomical areas.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the image quality of low-dose temporal bone computed tomography (CT) in otitis media and mastoiditis patients by using deep learning reconstruction (DLR).

Materials And Methods: A total of ninety-seven temporal bones from 53 consecutive adult patients who had suspected otitis media and mastoiditis and underwent temporal bone CT were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent high resolution CT protocol (group A) and an additional low-dose protocol (group B). In group A, high resolution data were reconstructed by filter back projection (FBP). In group B, low-dose data were reconstructed by DLR mild (B1), DLR standard (B2) and DLR strong (B3). The objective image quality was analyzed by measuring the CT value and image noise on the transverse image and calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on incudomallear joint, retroauricular muscle, vestibule and subcutaneous fat. Subjective image quality was analyzed by using a five-point scale to evaluate nine anatomical structures of middle and inner ear. The number of temporal bone lesions which involved in five structures of middle ear were assessed in group A, B1, B2 and B3 images.

Results: There were no significant differences in the CT values of the four reconstruction methods at four structures (all p > 0.05). The DLR group B1, B2 and B3 had significantly less image noise and a significantly higher SNR than group A at four structures (all p < 0.001). The group B1 had comparable subjective image quality as group A in nine structures (all p > 0.05), however, the group B3 had lower subjective image quality than group A in modiolus, spiral osseous lamina and stapes (all p < 0.001), the group B2 had lower subjective image quality than group A in modiolus and spiral osseous lamina (both p < 0.05). The number of temporal bone lesions which involved in five structures for group A, B1 and B2 images were no significant difference (all p > 0.05), however, the number of temporal bone lesions which involved in mastoid for group B3 images were significantly more than group A (p < 0.05). The radiation dose of high resolution CT protocol and low-dose protocol were 0.55 mSv and 0.11 mSv, respectively.

Conclusion: Compared with high resolution CT protocol, in the low-dose protocol of temporal bone CT, DLR mild and standard could improve the objective image quality, maintain good subjective image quality and satisfy clinical diagnosis of otitis media and mastoiditis patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750061PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22810DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
20
temporal bone
16
otitis media
12
media mastoiditis
12
group
9
deep learning
8
learning reconstruction
8
image
8
quality low-dose
8
low-dose temporal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!