AI Article Synopsis

  • The study reviews literature on gaseous inorganic pollutants in indoor cultural heritage spaces, analyzing 66 articles from 1984-2021, predominantly in Europe.
  • The majority of monitoring occurred in museums, mainly using passive samplers for nitrogen and sulfur dioxide, while direct-reading devices were utilized for ozone.
  • Results showed varying average pollutant concentrations, often lower when mechanical ventilation with filters was used, highlighting the need for standardized monitoring methods and pollutant thresholds to protect cultural materials.

Article Abstract

This contribution presents the results of a review of scientific literature on gaseous inorganic pollutants monitored in confined indoor spaces housing cultural heritage. A survey on standards suggesting concentration thresholds together with European projects on the topic was provided. Sixty-six scientific articles were systematically selected based on the PRISMA flow diagram over the period 1984-2021 for a total number of 80 case studies mainly located in Europe (64%). Monitoring was mainly performed in museums and galleries (61%), specifically in exhibition rooms (79%). Active devices were rarely employed, whereas passive samplers, exposed in situ and then laboratory-analysed, were mostly used for nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide monitoring. Direct-reading continuous devices were widely used for ozone monitoring. It was found that average concentrations of ozone were below 5 ppb in only 50% of cases, nitrogen dioxide below 10 ppb in more than 60% of cases, nitric oxide below 5 ppb in 30% of cases, nitric and nitrous acid below 1 ppb in less than 50% of cases, sulphur dioxide below 2 ppb in more than 60% of cases, and hydrogen sulphide below 0.1 ppb in only 25% of cases. Comparisons were performed following the thresholds suggested in the literature. The lowest concentration values were usually associated to the use of mechanical ventilation systems equipped with air filters and to non-urban case studies. The low number of case studies can be due to the difficulties to perform monitoring in conservation spaces with current instruments. Further research should be conducted to uniform standards that suggest instruments' requirements and pollutant thresholds to limit degradation on cultural materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12216-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

case studies
12
conservation spaces
8
number case
8
nitrogen dioxide
8
sulphur dioxide
8
ppb 50%
8
50% cases
8
dioxide ppb
8
ppb 60%
8
60% cases
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!