The use of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) therapy for bone healing and fracture treatment is increasingly considered as a therapeutic alternative with moderate economic cost and none or minimal adverse effects (e.g., low reaction to the conductive gel). However, there is some controversy regarding its scientific evidence. The present review seeks to shed some light on this controversy and to cover an area of study not occupied by previous or current work on ultrasound therapy. It is necessary to know the real impact of the treatment with low intensity pulsed ultrasound in patients with osteotomy, as well as its applicability as a post-surgery protocol to improve the recovery and rehabilitation processes and, at the end of the day, to reduce the time of disability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2023.100826DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulsed ultrasound
12
ultrasound patients
8
patients osteotomy
8
low intensity
8
intensity pulsed
8
[effectiveness low-intensity
4
low-intensity pulsed
4
ultrasound
4
osteotomy systematic
4
systematic review]
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!