AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the effects of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on lung cancer patients, comparing outcomes from 2020 with those from the same period in 2019.
  • Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, but 2020 patients were older and had more non-smokers.
  • Despite concerns, the lockdown did not negatively affect lung cancer management or long-term survival; instead, some patients saw improved outcomes, especially non-smokers and those receiving systemic therapies.

Article Abstract

The consequences of the strict health restrictions during the first wave of COVID-19 on lung cancer (LC) patients are not known. This cohort study evaluated the impact of the initial lockdown on management of and long-term outcome in LC patients. This exposed-unexposed-type study included two evaluation periods of 6 months each in non-selected patients; one began on the first day of lockdown in 2020, and the other in 2019 during the same calendar period. Various indicators were compared: clinical profiles, management delays and overall survival beyond 2 years. A total of 816 patients from 7 public or private centers were enrolled. The clinical characteristics of the patients in 2020 did not differ from those in 2019, except that the population was older ( = 0.002) with more non-smokers ( = 0.006). Delays for pre-therapeutic medical management were generally reduced after the first imaging in 2020 (1.28 [1.1-1.49]). In the multivariate analysis, being part of the 2020 cohort was correlated with better prognosis (HR = 0.71 [0.5-0.84], < 0.001). The gain observed in 2020 mainly benefited non-smoking patients, along with ECOG PS 0-2 ( = 0.01), stage 4 ( = 0.003), squamous cell carcinoma ( = 0.03) and receiving systemic therapy ( = 0.03). In conclusion, the first lockdown did not exert any deleterious impact on LC patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10742265PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245729DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cohort study
8
lung cancer
8
patients
8
cancer patients
8
0
5
comparative multicenter
4
multicenter cohort
4
study evaluating
4
evaluating long-term
4
long-term influence
4

Similar Publications

Objective: Identify common pathogens and antibiotic resistances in chronic rhinosinusitis patients post-endoscopic sinus surgery presenting with an active sinus infection.

Study Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single-institution rhinology private practice in Southeast Florida.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The implication of pericardial effusion in the third trimester for preeclampsia and heart failure in high-risk pregnant women.

J Echocardiogr

January 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 42601, Republic of Korea.

Background: With the growing number of high-risk pregnant women, echocardiography frequently reveals pericardial effusion (PE). However, the clinical implications of PE are unknown.

Method: We analyzed a cohort of 406 high-risk pregnant women who underwent echocardiography in the third trimester between November 2019 and December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Stockholm Early Detection of Cancer Study (STEADY-CAN) cohort was established to investigate strategies for early cancer detection in a population-based context within Stockholm County, the capital region of Sweden. Utilising real-world data to explore cancer-related healthcare patterns and outcomes, the cohort links extensive clinical and laboratory data from both inpatient and outpatient care in the region. The dataset includes demographic information, detailed diagnostic codes, laboratory results, prescribed medications, and healthcare utilisation data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

More micrometastases, more recurrence? The role of qPCR of PSA mRNA in lymph nodes during prostatectomy.

World J Urol

January 2025

Department of Urology, Urooncology, Robot-assisted and Focal Therapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.

Background And Objectives: Radical prostatectomy is a standard treatment for prostate cancer, yet about 30% of patients experience rising biochemical markers within a decade post-surgery. Pelvic lymph node sampling during prostatectomy assesses potential lymph node metastases, but standard histological assessments, which typically examine only 2-3 tissue sections, often miss occult metastases. This study assesses the effectiveness of qPCR in detecting PSA coding KLK3 mRNA for identifying lymph node metastases post-prostatectomy and explores the correlation between PSA-mRNA and biochemical recurrence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!