Differences in heart rate responses to upright posture are associated with variations in the high-frequency power of heart rate variability.

High resting heart rate is a cardiovascular risk factor, but limited data exist on the underlying hemodynamics and reproducibility of supine-to-upright increase in heart rate. We recorded noninvasive hemodynamics in 574 volunteers [age, 44.9 yr; body mass index (BMI), 26.4 kg/m; 49% male] during passive head-up tilt (HUT) using whole body impedance cardiography and radial artery tonometry. Heart rate regulation was evaluated using heart rate variability (HRV) analyses. Comparisons were made between quartiles of supine-to-upright heart rate changes, in which heart rate at rest ranged 62.6-64.8 beats/min ( = 0.285). The average upright increases in heart rate in the were 4.7, 9.9, 13.5, and 21.0 beats/min, respectively ( < 0.0001). No differences were observed in the low-frequency power of HRV, whether in the supine or upright position, or in the high-frequency power of HRV in the supine position. Upright high-frequency power of HRV was highest in with lowest upright heart rate and lowest in with highest upright heart rate. Mean systolic blood pressure before and during HUT (126 vs. 108 mmHg) and the increase in systemic vascular resistance during HUT (650 vs. 173 dyn·s/cm/m) were highest in and lowest in . The increases in heart rate during HUT on three separate occasions several weeks apart were highly reproducible ( = 0.682) among 215 participants. To conclude, supine-to-upright increase in heart rate is a reproducible phenotype with underlying differences in the modulation of cardiac parasympathetic tone and systemic vascular resistance. As heart rate at rest influences prognosis, future research should elucidate the prognostic significance of these phenotypic differences. Subjects with similar supine heart rates are characterized by variable increases in heart rate during upright posture. Individual heart rate increases in response to upright posture are highly reproducible as hemodynamic phenotypes and present underlying differences in the modulation of cardiac parasympathetic tone and systemic vascular resistance. These results indicate that resting heart rate obtained in the supine position alone is not an optimal means of classifying people into groups with differences in cardiovascular function.