AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence tools such as OpenAI's GPT-4 have shown promise in medical education, but their potential in dermatology remains unexplored.

Objectives: To assess GPT-4's performance on dermatology board-style questions and determine its value as a supplementary educational tool for trainees and educators.

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated GPT-4's performance on 250 random dermatology board-style questions sampled from the American Academy of Dermatology's Board Prep Plus resource. Questions were divided into five subspecialties and various difficulty levels. GPT-4 responses were compared to the correct answers and evaluated by two physicians.

Results: GPT-4 achieved an overall accuracy of 75% on the 250 questions, with no significant variation based on subspecialty or question difficulty. The most common errors were factual and misunderstanding inaccuracies. Responses scored high in clarity, accuracy, and relevance but frequently lacked depth and completeness.

Conclusion: GPT-4 performed to a high degree and demonstrated promising performance as an educational adjunct in dermatology. Improvements in response depth and completeness are needed before its use as an unsupervised learning tool is established.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijd.16913DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

openai's gpt-4
8
high degree
8
gpt-4's performance
8
dermatology board-style
8
board-style questions
8
dermatology
5
questions
5
gpt-4 performs
4
performs high
4
degree board-style
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!