Aims: Relationship between body mass index (BMI), frailty, and clinical adverse events remains unclear in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in different patient populations. We aimed to compare the association of BMI, frailty, and clinical adverse events between a US cohort from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study and a Chinese cohort from the Heart Failure Registry of Patient Outcomes (HERO) study.

Methods And Results: We used data of 1715 participants enrolled from America in the TOPCAT study and 1487 patients with HFpEF in the Chinese registry study, the HERO. We evaluated the relationship between BMI and frailty using multivariate restricted cubic spline logistic regression. Association between frailty and BMI categories and primary outcomes including HF hospitalization, aborted sudden death, and cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization were analysed by Cox proportional hazards models. The patients' mean age was 72 ± 11 years for both study populations, with 50% and 46% female for the TOPCAT study and the HERO study, respectively. Patients in the TOPCAT study had a higher mean BMI (33.9 vs. 24 kg/m), with 72.3% vs. 52.9% defined as moderately to severely frail (frailty index > 0.3). In the TOPCAT study, risk of frailty rose as BMI increased, but not in the HERO study. Patients with frailty were at significant higher risk for the primary composite outcomes [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84 (95% confidence interval: 1.46-2.32)], all-cause mortality [HR 1.73 (1.34-2.25)], and HF hospitalization [HR 1.83 (1.40-2.40)] in the TOPCAT study. The corresponding numbers in the HERO study were 1.26 (1.01-1.57), 2.21 (1.45-3.35), and 1.15 (0.81-1.37), respectively. The association of frailty with clinical outcomes did not vary with BMI categories in the two studies.

Conclusions: BMI distribution and association between BMI and frailty risk were different between the two study populations. Frailty was associated with clinical adverse events and this association was consistent across different BMI categories in both studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966215PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14595DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

topcat study
24
heart failure
16
bmi frailty
16
frailty clinical
12
clinical adverse
12
adverse events
12
study
12
bmi categories
12
hero study
12
frailty
11

Similar Publications

Systolic Blood Pressure and Pulse Pressure in Heart Failure: Pooled Participant-Level Analysis of 4 Trials.

J Am Coll Cardiol

November 2024

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Hypertension is common in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), and current guidelines recommend treating systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a target <130 mm Hg. However, data supporting treatment to this target are limited. Additionally, pulse pressure (PP), a marker of aortic stiffness, has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, but its prognostic impact in HFpEF has not been extensively studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) represent one of the cornerstones of treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Post-hoc data from the TOPCAT trial, conducted in patients with heart failure mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), suggest the possible clinical benefit of MRAs, particularly for slightly reduced ejection fraction values. The advent of non-steroidal MRAs, including finerenone, seems to represent a turning point in the treatment for HFmrEF/HFpEF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is crucial in heart failure, where excess aldosterone causes various cardiovascular issues like vascular stiffness and inflammation.
  • Aldosterone antagonists, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, have shown significant benefits in improving cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure studies like RALES, EPHESUS, and EMPHASIS-HF.
  • Ongoing research is exploring newer-generation mineralocorticoid antagonists and aldosterone synthase inhibitors, particularly their effects on patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Novel Adiposity Indices Are Associated With Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Without the Obesity Paradox.

J Am Heart Assoc

November 2024

State Key Laboratory for Innovation and Transformation of Luobing Theory, Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Cardiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan China.

Background: There is limited study that illuminates the relationship between obesity indices and prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, nor has it been examined whether the obesity paradox persists when using these metrics.

Methods And Results: This study is a post hoc analysis of data from the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. A total of 3114 individuals were included in our final analysis, and a total of 481 (15.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Associations of Depression, Antidepressants with Atrial Fibrillation Risk in HFpEF Patients.

Rev Cardiovasc Med

October 2024

Department of Cardiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, 330006 Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the relationship between atrial fibrillation (AF), major depression, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), highlighting a lack of prior research on this topic.
  • In a trial involving 784 patients, 29.1% were found to have major depression, but having this condition did not increase the risk of developing AF; the analysis showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.82.
  • Additionally, antidepressant use did not significantly affect AF incidence in patients with HFpEF and major depression, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.41.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!