A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Performance of non-formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples in hybrid capture and amplicon next-generation sequencing panels. | LitMetric

Background: Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is fundamental for driving prognostic and therapy in cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue is the widely used material, whereas non-FFPE may represent an alternative. However, studies comparing the NGS performance of non-FFPE materials to FFPE are still lacking in the literature. The objective of this study was to characterize in non-FFPE preparations the nucleic acid yield and NGS performance on both a capture-based and an amplicon-based NGS platform. NGS quality metrics obtained from non-FFPE preparations were compared to FFPE.

Methods: We analyzed the cellularity and nucleic acid yield in 111 tumors from non-FFPE preparations. In addition, comprehensive hybrid capture panel sequencing metrics obtained from DNA and RNA libraries were compared between independent non-FFPE and FFPE samples. A paired comparison between non-FFPE and FFPE samples was performed to analyze concordance in mutant allele detection using an amplicon panel.

Results: The mean target coverage from DNA libraries was 2× higher in non-FFPE samples than in FFPE. The detection of exogenous DNA was 2.5× higher in non-FFPE than in FFPE. Conversely, a lower performance was observed in non-FFPE RNA libraries in comparison to FFPE DNA libraries with no impact in minimum standard cutoffs. The variant allele detection in non-FFPE was found to be comparable to that of FFPE tumor samples in matched samples.

Conclusions: Non-FFPE was demonstrated to be a suitable material for DNA and RNA library preparations using a comprehensive NGS panel. This is the first study reporting library quality metrics according to the TSO500 analysis pipeline.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.25267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-ffpe
12
non-ffpe preparations
12
non-ffpe ffpe
12
paraffin embedded
8
hybrid capture
8
next-generation sequencing
8
ffpe
8
ngs performance
8
nucleic acid
8
acid yield
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!