Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Portable, cost-effective PET cameras can radically expand the applicability of PET. We present here a within-participant comparison of fully quantified [F]FDG dynamic scans in healthy volunteers using the standard Biograph mCT scanner and portable CerePET scanner. Each of 20 healthy volunteers underwent dynamic [F]FDG imaging with both scanners (1-154 d apart) and concurrent arterial blood sampling. Tracer SUV, net influx rate (K), and the corresponding cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMR) were quantified at regional and voxel levels. At the regional level, CerePET outcome measure estimates within participants robustly correlated with Biograph mCT estimates in the neocortex, wherein the average Pearson correlation coefficients across participants ± SD were 0.83 ± 0.07 (SUV) and 0.85 ± 0.08 (K and CMR). There was also strong agreement between CerePET and Biograph mCT estimates, wherein the average regression slopes across participants were 0.84 ± 0.17 (SUV), 0.83 ± 0.17 (K), and 0.85 ± 0.18 (CMR). There was similar bias across participants but higher correlation and less variability in subcortical regions than in cortical regions. Pearson correlation coefficients for subcortical regions equaled 0.97 ± 0.02 (SUV) and 0.97 ± 0.03 (K and CMR), and average regression slopes equaled 0.79 ± 0.14 (SUV), 0.83 ± 0.11 (K), and 0.86 ± 0.11 (CMR). In voxelwise assessment, CerePET and Biograph mCT estimates across outcome measures were significantly different only in a cluster of left frontal white matter. Our results indicate robust correlation and agreement between semi- and fully quantitative brain glucose metabolism measurements from portable CerePET and standard Biograph mCT scanners. The results obtained with a portable PET scanner in this comparison in humans require follow-up but lend confidence to the feasibility of more flexible and portable brain imaging with PET.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858383 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265309 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!