Rural-Urban Disparities in the Continuum of Thyroid Cancer Care: Analysis of 92,794 Cases.

Thyroid

Section of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Published: May 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Rural and frontier areas have worse thyroid cancer outcomes compared to urban regions, with higher disease incidence and mortality rates.
  • The study analyzed data from nearly 93,000 thyroid cancer patients in California between 1999-2017, highlighting demographic differences and disease stages at diagnosis.
  • Key findings show that rural and frontier patients are more likely to be Native American or White, uninsured, and face socioeconomic disadvantages, leading to increased likelihood of distant disease at diagnosis and being lost to follow-up care.*

Article Abstract

Rurality is associated with higher incidence and higher disease-specific mortality for most cancers. Outcomes for rural and ultrarural ("frontier") patients with thyroid cancer are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify actionable deficits in thyroid cancer outcomes for rural patients. We queried linked California Cancer Registry and California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development databases for patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer (1999-2017). We analyzed time from disease stage at diagnosis, time from diagnosis to surgery, receipt of appropriate radioactive iodine ablation, surveillance status, and overall and disease-specific mortality for urban, rural, and frontier patients. Cox and logistic regression models controlled for clinical and demographic covariates a stepwise manner. All incidence figures are expressed as a proportion of newly diagnosed cases. Our cohort comprised 92,794 subjects: (65,475 women [70.6%]; mean age 50.0 years). Compared to urban patients, rural and frontier patients were more likely to be American Indian, White, uninsured, and from lower quintiles of socioeconomic status ( < 0.01). Distant disease at diagnosis was more common in rural (56.0 vs. 50.4 cases per 1000 new cases,  < 0.01) and frontier patients (80.9 vs. 50.4 per 1000,  < 0.01) compared to urban patients. The incidence of medullary thyroid cancer was greater in rural patients (17.9 vs. 13.6 cases per 1000,  < 0.01) and frontier patients (31.0 vs. 13.6 per 1000,  < 0.01) compared to urban patients. The incidence of anaplastic thyroid cancer was higher in frontier versus urban patients (15.5 vs. 7.1 per 1000,  < 0.01). When compared to urban patients, rural and frontier patients were more often lost to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 1.69 [confidence interval, CI 1.54-1.85], and OR 3.03 [CI 1.89-5.26], respectively) and had higher disease-specific mortality (OR 1.18 [CI 1.07-1.30], and OR 1.92 [CI 1.22-2.77], respectively). Rural and frontier residence was independently associated with being lost to follow-up, suggesting that it is a key driver of disparities. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural and frontier patients with thyroid cancer present with later-stage disease and experience higher disease-specific mortality. They also are more often lost to follow-up, which presents an opportunity for targeted outreach to reduce the observed disparities in outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0357DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thyroid cancer
16
disease-specific mortality
8
outcomes rural
8
rural frontier
8
frontier patients
8
patients
6
cancer
5
rural-urban disparities
4
disparities continuum
4
thyroid
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!