AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated how different types of therapy (active, passive, manual) for low back pain affected the need for more intensive medical interventions over a year, such as opioid prescriptions and hospital visits.
  • - Results showed that most patients received active therapies, but those who also had passive treatments were more likely to need additional care later, with a significant increase in risk linked to specific passive interventions like mechanical traction.
  • - The findings suggest that while passive therapies are common, they may lead to worse health outcomes compared to manual therapy, prompting physical therapists to be careful about using these methods for low back pain treatment.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore associations between the utilization of active, passive, and manual therapy interventions for low back pain (LBP) with 1-year escalation-of-care events, including opioid prescriptions, spinal injections, specialty care visits, and hospitalizations.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 4827 patients identified via the Military Health System Data Repository who received physical therapist care for LBP in 4 outpatient clinics between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2018. One-year escalation-of-care events were evaluated based on type of physical therapist interventions (ie, active, passive, or manual therapy) received using adjusted odds ratios.

Results: Most patients (89.9%) received active interventions. Patients with 10% higher proportion of visits that included at least 1 passive intervention had a 3% to 6% higher likelihood of 1-year escalation-of-care events. Similarly, with 10% higher proportion of passive to active interventions used during the course of care, there was a 5% to 11% higher likelihood of 1-year escalation-of-care events. When compared to patients who received active interventions only, the likelihood of incurring 1-year escalation-of-care events was 50% to 220% higher for those who received mechanical traction and 2 or more different passive interventions, but lower by 50% for patients who received manual therapy.

Conclusion: Greater use of passive interventions for LBP was associated with elevated odds of 1-year escalation-of-care events. In addition, the use of specific passive interventions such as mechanical traction in conjunction with active interventions resulted in suboptimal escalation-of-care events, while the use of manual therapy was associated with more favorable downstream health care outcomes.

Impact: Physical therapists should be judicious in the use of passive interventions for the management of LBP as they are associated with greater likelihood of receiving opioid prescriptions, spinal injections, and specialty care visits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzad173DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

escalation-of-care events
28
1-year escalation-of-care
20
manual therapy
16
active interventions
16
passive interventions
16
active passive
12
passive manual
12
interventions
11
passive
9
therapy interventions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!