A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Relationship Between Facial Bone Dimensions, Orofacial Implant Position, and Esthetic Outcomes of Single-Tooth Implants. | LitMetric

Purpose: To investigate the association between the orofacial implant position distance (ID) and facial bone crest thickness (FBCT) in single-tooth implant crowns (STICs) placed in the esthetic zone and to predict the presence of facial bone above the implant shoulder, as well as its impact on Pink and White Esthetic Scores (PES and WES) and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs).

Materials And Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all patients treated with STICs in the esthetic zone between 2006 and 2013 with at least 12 months postloading were invited to enroll. CBCTs were used to assess ID and FBCT. Esthetic outcomes included the PES and WES. PROMs included a participant satisfaction questionnaire with 13 questions formulated for this study. Descriptive statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used. The associations between ID, FBCT, esthetic outcomes, and PROMs were calculated.

Results: Data were available for 60 implants. Mean ID was 2.02 mm (SD = 0.77). Mean FBCT at the implant shoulder was 0.99 mm (SD = 0.98). FBCT was significantly associated with higher PES scores (P = .040), but not with WES scores (P = 0.149). FBCT was significantly associated with ID (P = .009), and implants positioned ≥ 1.6 mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth were likely to have higher FBCT.

Conclusions: FBCT influences PES and is more predictable if implants are positioned ≥ 1.6 mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8052DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial bone
12
esthetic outcomes
12
orofacial implant
8
implant position
8
stics esthetic
8
esthetic zone
8
implant shoulder
8
pes wes
8
fbct esthetic
8
fbct associated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!