A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Balloon-Occluded Thrombolysis with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients of Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Occluded Direct Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS) stent placement is a treatment for Budd-Chiari syndrome, but it can become occluded due to thrombosis, leading to complications.
  • A study compared a new technique called balloon-occluded thrombolysis (BOT) with the traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treating occluded DIPS stents, focusing on successful recanalization, hospital stay length, and medication dosage.
  • Results showed that BOT led to a higher recanalization rate, shorter hospital stays, and lower doses of thrombolytic agents than CDT, suggesting that BOT is a more efficient and safer option for DIPS stent revision.

Article Abstract

 Direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS) stent placement is an effective treatment for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS); however, thrombotic occlusion of DIPS stent remains a cause of concern. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel technique of balloon-occluded-thrombolysis (BOT) for occluded DIPS stent, and compare it with the conventional catheter-directed-thrombolysis (CDT).  In this retrospective study, the hospital database was searched for BCS patients who underwent DIPS revision for thrombotic stent occlusion between January 2015 and February 2021. Patients were divided into CDT group and BOT group. The groups were compared for technical success, total dose of thrombolytic agent administered, duration of hospital stay, and primary assisted stent patency rates at 1- and 6-month follow-up.  CDT was performed in 12 patients, whereas 21 patients underwent BOT. Complete recanalization was achieved in 66.7% (8 of 12) patients of CDT group as compared to 81% (17 of 21) patients of BOT group (nonsignificant difference,  = 0.420). BOT group had a short hospital stay (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0 days) and required less dose of thrombolytic agent ([2.2 ± 0.4]x10 IU versus [8.3 ± 2.9]x10 IU of urokinase) as compared to the CDT group and both differences were statistically significant (  < 0.001). Further, 6-month patency rate was higher in BOT group as compared to CDT group (  = 0.024).  The novel BOT technique of DIPS revision allows longer contact time of thrombolytic agent with the thrombi within the occluded stent. This helps in achieving fast recanalization of thrombosed DIPS stent with a significantly less dose of thrombolytic agent required, thus reducing the risk of systemic complications associated with thrombolytic administration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723961PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1770343DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dips stent
12
cdt group
12
bot group
12
patients
8
patients budd-chiari
8
budd-chiari syndrome
8
intrahepatic portosystemic
8
portosystemic shunt
8
patients underwent
8
dose thrombolytic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!