Background: Single-isocenter (SI) noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (NC-VMAT) has been widely used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for multiple brain metastases (BMs). However, it is critical to verify patient positioning at a noncoplanar couch angle. This study aimed to compare the noncoplanar setup discrepancies between kilo-voltage/mega-voltage image (kV/MV) orthogonal image pairs with a 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (2D/3D) matching mode and noncoplanar cone-beam computed tomography (NC-CBCT) with a 3D/3D matching mode in SI NC-VMAT HSRT for multiple BMs.
Methods: Twenty patients with multiple BMs [2-5] who underwent SI NC-VMAT HSRT were enrolled in this study. Prior to each noncoplanar field delivery, both kV/MV orthogonal image pairs and NC-CBCT were used to determine setup errors. The setup error values reported by NC-CBCT were defined as the gold standard and compared to those reported by kV/MV orthogonal image pairs. The Bland-Altman analysis method was utilized to assess the agreement of the two positioning modalities.
Results: In total, 104 kV/MV image pairs and NC-CBCT scans were acquired. The mean setup error differences (SEDs; absolute values) between the two positioning systems were 0.17 mm, 0.21 mm, 0.16 mm, 0.22°, 0.18°, and 0.17° in the vertical, longitudinal, lateral, yaw, pitch, and roll directions, respectively. The maximum SEDs regarding translation and rotation occurred in the longitudinal and yaw directions at 0.60 mm and 0.8°, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between the two positioning modalities, and the 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) never exceeded 0.6 mm and 0.6° in the translational and rotational directions, respectively. Only 4.80% of SEDs exceeded the tolerance of 0.5 mm/0.5°.
Conclusions: Orthogonal kV/MV image pairs with 2D/3D matching mode could provide comparable accuracy for noncoplanar positioning as NC-CBCT with 3D/3D matching mode.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722029 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-463 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Diabetes
January 2025
Center for Evaluation and Survey Research, HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, United States.
Background: Food choices play a significant role in achieving glycemic goals and optimizing overall health for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can provide a comprehensive look at the impact of foods and other behaviors on glucose in real time and over the course of time. The impact of using a nutrition-focused approach (NFA) when initiating CGM in people with T2D is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Magn Reson Imaging
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Background: Deep learning-based segmentation of brain metastases relies on large amounts of fully annotated data by domain experts. Semi-supervised learning offers potential efficient methods to improve model performance without excessive annotation burden.
Purpose: This work tests the viability of semi-supervision for brain metastases segmentation.
Anal Chem
January 2025
Institute for Advanced Optics, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, Hunan 414006, China.
Diffraction imaging of cells allows rapid phenotyping by the response of intracellular molecules to coherent illumination. However, its ability to distinguish numerous types of human leukocytes remains to be investigated. Here, we show that accurate classification of three lymphocyte subtypes can be achieved with features extracted from cross-polarized diffraction image (p-DI) pairs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Maxillofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the applicability of smartphone-based three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for clinical use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing two smartphone-based approaches to the gold standard.
Methods: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.
J Contemp Dent Pract
September 2024
Department of Pediatrics Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty Odonto-Stomatology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a combination of immediate implant placement with maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) solely using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on guided bone regeneration.
Materials And Methods: An interventional before-after (pre-post) study design was used with 30 dental patients (≥18 years of age; 14 males and 16 females) with initial bone heights ranging between 4 and 6 mm. Following the general check-up and the creation of a study model, the planned implant location demonstrated an external right maxilla diameter of more than 5 mm, thereby validating the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiograph.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!