AI Article Synopsis

  • Metastatic breast cancer patients who don't respond to standard treatments need better therapies, so a phase II trial tested pemetrexed combined with vinorelbine against vinorelbine alone.
  • The trial involved 125 patients across 17 centers in Korea, and results showed that the combination significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) compared to vinorelbine alone (5.7 months vs. 1.5 months).
  • While the combination therapy improved disease control, it did lead to a higher occurrence of anemia, although severe neutropenia rates were similar in both treatment groups.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthracycline and taxanes often shows rapid progression. The development of effective and tolerable combination regimens for these patients is needed. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: This randomized, open-label, phase II trial was conducted in 17 centers in Korea. Patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vinorelbine or pemetrexed plus vinorelbine. Randomization was stratified by prior capecitabine treatment and hormone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and quality of life.

Results: Between March 2017 and August 2019, a total of 125 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months, 118 progression events and 88 death events had occurred. Sixty-two patients were assigned to the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm, and 63 were assigned to the vinorelbine arm. Pemetrexed plus vinorelbine significantly prolonged PFS compared to vinorelbine (5.7 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.001). The combination arm had higher disease control rate (76.8% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001) and a tendency toward longer overall survival (16.8 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.102). Anemia was more frequent in the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm per cycle compared with vinorelbine (7.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia per cycle between the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm and the vinorelbine single arm (14.7% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.066).

Conclusions: This phase II study showed that pemetrexed plus vinorelbine led to a longer PFS than vinorelbine. Adverse events of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine were generally manageable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113456DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pemetrexed vinorelbine
20
metastatic breast
12
breast cancer
12
phase trial
12
vinorelbine
8
patients metastatic
8
randomized open-label
8
vinorelbine arm
8
patients
6
pemetrexed
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!