A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The therapeutic effect of decitabine combined with HAG in acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective case-control analysis. | LitMetric

Objective: Explore the efficacy of decitabine combined with homoharringtonine + cytarabine + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HAG) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Patients And Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 125 patients with AML was done. Of them, 61 patients received a simple HAG treatment (HAG group), and 64 received decitabine combined with an HAG regimen (combined group). Treatment efficacy, immune function before and after the treatment, levels of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared.

Results: The total response rate of the combined group (84.38%) was higher than that of the HAG group (65.63%) (p < 0.05). After the treatment, levels of CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in both groups increased and were significantly higher in the combined group compared to the HAG group. Levels of CD8+, bFGF and VEGF decreased compared to pre-treatment levels and were significantly lower in the combined group than in the HAG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse reactions between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to HAG treatment alone, the combination of decitabine and HAG in the treatment of AML is safe, can significantly improve the immune function of the patients, regulate bFGF and VEGF levels, and improve overall treatment efficacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202312_34572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hag treatment
16
hag group
16
combined group
16
decitabine combined
12
hag
10
combined hag
8
acute myeloid
8
myeloid leukemia
8
treatment
8
group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!