AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the impact of preserving the superior segment (S6) during common basal segmentectomy on lung volume and function compared to lower lobectomy in lung cancer patients.
  • Analysis involved 48 patients who underwent segmentectomies and 96 patients who had lobectomies, focusing on factors like age, preoperative lung function, and CT-measured lung volume.
  • Results indicated that segmentectomy led to a greater reduction in total lung volume immediately post-surgery and at long-term follow-up, with no significant benefit observed in preserving superior segment S6 for lung function preservation.

Article Abstract

Background: The beneficial effect of preserved superior segment (S6) after common basal segmentectomy remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of preserved superior segment on lung volume and function.

Methods: Among 671 segmentectomies and 2,249 lobectomies for clinical stage IA lung cancer between 2004 and 2020, 48 patients who received thoracoscopic common basal segmentectomy were included and compared with 96 patients who received thoracoscopic lower lobectomy after propensity score matching. The variables analyzed were age, sex, comorbidity, smoking history, preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), clinical T stage, histology, and tumor location. Lung volume was assessed using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric method.

Results: There were no significant differences between common basal segmentectomy (segmentectomy group) and lower lobectomy (lobectomy group) (4,183.8±1,114.9 versus 3,850.7±1,132.1 mL; P=0.10) in terms of preoperative CT-measured total lung volume. At the immediate postoperative median follow-up period (6.4 months), the reduced percentage of CT-measured total lung volume in the segmentectomy group was significantly larger than that in the lobectomy group (-16.2% versus -6.5%; P=0.004). The percentage of CT-measured contralateral lung volume expansion in the segmentectomy group was significantly smaller than that in the lobectomy group (-0.7% versus +8.9%; P=0.006). At the last median follow-up period (43.1 months), the reduced percentage of CT-measured total lung volume in the segmentectomy group remained larger than that in the lobectomy group (-13.0% versus -3.0%; P=0.01). The reduced percentage of postoperative FEV1 in the segmentectomy group did not differ from that in the lobectomy group (-9.9% versus -11.5%, P=0.63).

Conclusions: Preserving the superior segment might not provide beneficial effect on the preservation of postoperative lung volume and function after common basal segmentectomy compared with lower lobectomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10713294PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-791DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung volume
28
segmentectomy group
20
lobectomy group
20
superior segment
16
common basal
16
basal segmentectomy
16
lower lobectomy
12
ct-measured total
12
total lung
12
reduced percentage
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!