A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Third-line or above anlotinib in relapsed and refractory small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: A post hoc analysis of ALTER1202, a randomized, double-blind phase 2 study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib as a treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who also had brain metastases (BM), showing a poor prognosis.
  • An analysis of the ALTER1202 trial revealed that patients treated with anlotinib had significantly improved progression-free survival (3.8 months) and overall survival (6.1 months) compared to those receiving a placebo.
  • Anlotinib showed potential in delaying CNS progression and had a manageable side effect profile, with common serious adverse effects including increased lipase levels and hypertension.

Article Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and brain metastases (BM) was poor. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third-line or above treatment in SCLC with BM.

Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of the ALTER1202 trial, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the role of anlotinib as third-line treatment or above in patients with SCLC. This study included patients with BM at baseline. The efficacy and safety outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), central nervous system (CNS), objective response rate (ORR), CNS disease control rate (DCR), time to CNS progression, and adverse events (AEs).

Results: Twenty-one and nine patients with BM were included in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-6.1) and 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.1-8.0) in the anlotinib group. Anlotinib was associated with a significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.51,  = 0.0005) and OS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.73,  = 0.0061) than placebo. Anlotinib significantly prolonged the time to CNS progression ( < 0.0001). The anlotinib group had a higher CNS DCR than placebo (95.2% vs. 22.2%,  = 0.0001). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were increased lipase (19.0%), hypertension (14.3%), and hyponatremia (14.3%) in the anlotinib group.

Conclusions: Anlotinib proved to have potential CNS activity and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with SCLC and BM, significantly delaying CNS progression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686170PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cai2.43DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
brain metastases
8
analysis alter1202
8
efficacy safety
8
anlotinib third-line
8
third-line treatment
8
time cns
8
cns progression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!