This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In 2018, anonymous online provocative comments were submitted to student leaders of a Syrian Refugee Initiative (SRI) at the Penn State College of Medicine. This triggered a series of actions with students and medical school leaders aimed at identifying the person who submitted the comments, trying to understand mutual perspectives, and managing the impact of the event on the student body. We describe the history of our college's commitment to humanism and how the SRI was a direct outgrowth of that culture. Voices of the student leaders who were directly impacted by the provocative comments and educational leaders who worked to resolve the crisis are presented. We also describe a collaborative process that involved engaging cybersecurity experts to identify the perpetrator, and share how the students and educational leaders were able to develop trust despite initial skepticism by students over the leadership's avowed commitment to taking the hate speech seriously. While the perpetrator was never identified and opportunities for improvement were identified along the way, by including student leaders in the process, students and administrators were able to develop trust and reach reasonable closure on this disturbing event. Take home messages are presented to guide other institutions in navigating instances of provocative comments or speech.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712520PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.15694/mep.2019.000199.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

provocative comments
16
student leaders
12
medical school
8
educational leaders
8
develop trust
8
leaders
6
comments
5
collaborative response
4
provocative
4
response provocative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!