This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Aims and Method #ChoosePsychiatry is the Royal College of Psychiatrist's social media campaign aimed at medical students and foundation doctors to encourage recruitment into psychiatry. This study explored the reasons given for choosing psychiatry in videos uploaded by psychiatrists to Twitter alongside the campaign, through the use of thematic analysis. Results Each psychiatrist gave different reasons for choosing psychiatry but four main themes were identified: prior experience of psychiatry, career factors, patient factors and knowledge factors. Both undergraduate and postgraduate experiences were influential in choosing psychiatry. In particular, perceived job satisfaction, an opportunity to deliver holistic care and a sense of making a difference were also influential in choosing psychiatry. Clinical Implications Findings here support efforts to improve the undergraduate experience and to increase foundation posts, as well as maintaining some of the current key messages of the campaign. However, whilst engagement with the videos on Twitter was observed, further consideration of the most appropriate social media platform to ensure engagement with the target audience is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10711973 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000261.1 | DOI Listing |
CNS Drugs
January 2025
Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth, Truro, England.
There is a synergistic relationship between epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), and the approach to managing people with these conditions needs to be holistic. Epilepsy is the main co-morbidity associated with ID, and clinical presentation tends to be complex, associated with higher rates of treatment resistance, multi-morbidity and premature mortality. Despite this relationship, there is limited level 1 evidence to inform treatment choice for this vulnerable population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
January 2025
Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
There is, in the content of the Journal, an embarrassment of riches, and picking a "best" seems to demand a certain qualification: is the "best" the most interesting, most surprising, most educational, most important, most provocative, most enjoyable? How to choose? We are hardly unbiased and can admit to a special affection for the ones that we and the authors worked hardest on, modifying version after version into shape. Acknowledging these biases, here are the 2024 articles that we think deserve your attention or at least a second read.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Int Neuropsychol Soc
December 2024
Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York (CUNY), Flushing, NY, USA.
Objective: Research examining (MCI) criteria in diverse and/or health-disparate populations is limited. There is a critical need to investigate the predictive validity for incident dementia of widely used MCI definitions in diverse populations.
Method: Eligible participants were non-Hispanic White or Black Bronx community residents, free of dementia at enrollment, with at least one annual follow-up visit after baseline.
Cureus
November 2024
Medicine and Surgery, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, JOR.
A considerable amount of morbidity and disability are caused by a wide variety of neurological illnesses together referred to as neurodegenerative diseases. Among them, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases are the most prevalent and have been thoroughly studied. The development of intervention techniques that focus on the unfavorable elements of these diseases, particularly those that could help halt their course, has become increasingly important.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!