A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safe practices for bed bathing in the intensive care unit: validation of a checklist. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to validate a new checklist for safely bathing critically ill patients in the ICU.
  • Researchers created a 41-item checklist, assessed its validity with eleven judges, and tested its reliability across 54 bed bath procedures.
  • The findings showed that the checklist was highly reliable, with Kappa values indicating strong agreement among judges and excellent interobserver reliability, making it a valuable tool for improving patient care.

Article Abstract

Objective: To validate a checklist for safe bathing in critically ill patients.

Methods: This is a methodological and quantitative study. Researchers developed a checklist for safe bathing in critically ill patients consisting of 41 items, which were submitted to the apparent and content validation process, evaluated by eleven judges, and interobserver reliability. For reliability analysis, the instrument was applied in 54 bed bath procedures in the ICU; Kappa and CHF tests were used.

Results: In the apparent and content validation, adjustments were made according to the judges' suggestions. Kappa values ranged from moderate to almost perfect (0.462 to 0.962), and, in some items, there was 100% agreement; the reliability of the instrument was excellent (ICC = 0.962).

Conclusion: The instrument proved to be dependable and easy to apply. Its use will contribute to safe bed bathing and subsidize interventions aimed at increasing the quality of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704670PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0135DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bed bathing
8
checklist safe
8
safe bathing
8
bathing critically
8
critically ill
8
apparent content
8
content validation
8
safe
4
safe practices
4
practices bed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!