Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Conclusions on susceptibility of MMP3-1612 5A/6A to morbid risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) are controversial. This meta-analysis aims to obtain the accurate relationship between them.
Methods: Relevant literatures on susceptibility of MMP3-1612 5A/6A to morbid risk of CAD published before July 2019 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang. Data were extracted from eligible literatures and analyzed by RevMan5.3 and STATA12.0 for calculating OR and corresponding 95% CI. Study selection: A total of 18 literatures reporting MMP3-1612 5A/6A and CAD were enrolled. Data extraction was conducted by two researches independently. Any disagreement was solved by the third research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10710786 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/jomb0-43315 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!