Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Respiratory patterns present great variability, both in healthy subjects and in patients with different diseases and forms of nasal, oral, superficial or deep breathing. The analysis of this variability depends, among others, on the device used to record the signals that describe these patterns. In this study, we propose multivariable regression models to estimate tidal volume (V) considering different breathing patterns. Twenty-three healthy volunteers underwent continuous multisensor recordings considering different modes of breathing. Respiratory flow and volume signals were recorded with a pneumotachograph and thoracic and abdominal respiratory inductive plethysmographic bands. Several respiratory parameters were extracted from the volume signals, such as inspiratory and expiratory areas (Area, Area), maximum volume relative to the cycle start and end (VT, VT), inspiratory and expiratory time (T, T), cycle duration (T), and normalized parameters of clinical interest. The parameters with the greatest individual predictive power were combined using multivariable models to estimate V. Their performance were quantified in terms of determination coefficient (R), relative error (E) and interquartile range (IQR). Using only three parameters, the results obtained for the thoracic band (VT, T, Area) were better than those obtained from the abdominal band (VT, T, Area) with R = 0.94 (IQR: 0.07); E = 6.99 (IQR: 6.12) vs R = 0.91 (IQR: 0.09), E = 8.70 (IQR: 4.62). Overall performance increased to R = 0.97 (IQR: 0.02) and E = 4.60 (IQR: 3.68) when parameters from the different bands were combined, further improving when was applied to segments with different inspiration-expiration patterns. In particular, the nose-nose E = 1.39 (IQR: 0.73), nose-mouth E = 2.11 (IQR: 1.23) and mouth-mouth E = 2.29 (IQR: 1.44) patterns showed the best results compared to those obtained for basal, shallow and deep breathing.Clinical relevance- Respiratory pattern variability can be described using multivariable regression model for tidal volume.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340591 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!