AI Article Synopsis

  • Surgical treatment for cancer patients with epidural spinal cord compression has evolved significantly, particularly with the rise of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and separation surgery over the past 17 years.
  • A study of 383 patients showed increasing numbers of surgeries performed and a notable reduction in blood loss and transfusion rates, with those treated more recently experiencing better neurological improvements and mobility.
  • Despite these advancements in surgical technique and patient outcomes, overall survival rates remained unchanged, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach to patient management.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment is increasingly the treatment of choice in cancer patients with epidural spinal cord compression and spinal instability. There has also been an evolution in surgical treatment with the advent of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and separation surgery. This paper aims to investigate the changes in epidemiology, surgical technique, outcomes and complications in the last 17 years in a tertiary referral center in Singapore.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 383 patients with surgically treated spinal metastases treated between January 2005 to January 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups, patients treated between 2005 - 2010, 2011-2016, and 2017- 2021. Demographic, oncological, surgical, patient outcome and survival data were collected. Statistical analysis with univariate analysis was performed to compare the groups.

Results: There was an increase in surgical treatment (87 vs 105 vs 191). Lung, Breast and prostate cancer were the most common tumor types respectively. There was a significant increase in MIS(p<0.001) and Separation surgery (p<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in mean blood loss (1061ml vs 664 ml vs 594ml) (p<0.001) and total transfusion (562ml vs 349ml vs 239ml) (p<0.001). Group 3 patients were more likely to have improved or normal neurology (p=<0.001) and independent ambulatory status(p=0.012). There was no significant change in overall survival.

Conclusion: There has been a significant change in our surgical practice with decreased blood loss, transfusion and improved neurological and functional outcomes. Patients should be managed in a multidisciplinary manner and surgical treatment should be recommended when indicated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10699147PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1297553DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical treatment
12
spinal metastases
8
tertiary referral
8
referral center
8
surgical
6
trends surgical
4
surgical management
4
spinal
4
management spinal
4
metastases singaporean
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!