Background: The 30-day period following emergency colorectal surgery (ECRS) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. There is a lack of data assessing factors associated with outcomes of ECRS in the Saudi population.

Objectives: Assess factors associated with 30-day postoperative mortality and complications following ECRS.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary care center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Patients And Methods: Demographic characteristics (age, sex, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, pre-operative septic state, smoking, and comorbidities), operative characteristics (urgency, diverting ostomy, and procedure performed), and postoperative characteristics (length of stay, 30-day mortality, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ICU length of stay, surgical site infection [SSI], readmission, reoperation, and complications) were collected from electronic medical records. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate association with the outcome measures (30-day mortality and postoperative complications). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to evaluate independent variables.

Main Outcome Measure: Thirty-day postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Sample Size: 241 patients.

Results: Among 241 patients, 145 (60.2%) were men, and 80 (33.2%) patients were between 50-64 years of age. The most common indication for surgery was malignancy 138 (57%). The overall complication rate was 26.6% and the 30-day mortality rate was 11.2%. Left hemicolectomy was the most commonly performed procedure, performed in 69 (28.6%) patients. Patients between the age of 65-74 had an increased odds of death within 30 days (OR 5.25 [95% CI 1.03-26.5]) on univariate analysis. Preoperative sepsis was associated with a fourfold increase in the likelihood of 30-day mortality (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.21-16.24, =.024) on multivariate analysis. The likelihood of hospital re-admission increased by fivefold in patients who developed a postoperative complication (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.30-21.78, =.02).

Conclusion: Preoperative sepsis was independently associated with 30-day mortality in patients undergoing ECRS, while the likelihood of hospital readmission increased in patients with postoperative complications. Expeditious control of sepsis in the emergency surgical setting by both surgical and medical interventions may reduce the likelihood of postoperative mortality. Establishing discharge protocols for postoperative ECRS patients is advocated.

Limitations: Retrospective design, small sample size, and single setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182427PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.364DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

30-day mortality
24
factors associated
12
associated 30-day
12
postoperative mortality
12
mortality
10
patients
9
30-day
8
mortality morbidity
8
patients undergoing
8
emergency colorectal
8

Similar Publications

Background: Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have facilitated the creation of mortality prediction models which are increasingly used to assess quality of care and inform clinical practice. One open question is whether a hospital should utilize a mortality model trained from a diverse nationwide dataset or use a model developed primarily from their local hospital data.

Objective: To compare performance of a single-hospital, 30-day all-cause mortality model against an established national benchmark on the task of mortality prediction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Heart failure is a common complication in patients with sepsis, and individuals who experience both sepsis and heart failure are at a heightened risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to develop an effective nomogram model to predict the 7-day, 15-day, and 30-day survival probabilities of septic patients with heart failure in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study extracted the pertinent clinical data of septic patients with heart failure from the Critical Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomized Trial of Early versus Standard Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury After Type A Aortic Dissection.

Ann Thorac Surg

January 2025

Center for Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Background: We seek to study whether early initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) could reduce 90-day mortality and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury following acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, controlled trial that enrolled acute type A aortic dissection patients with severe post-operative acute kidney injury (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2) and with plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level > 150 ng/mL who did not have potentially life-threatening complications directly related to renal failure. Patients were randomized equally into two groups: the early RRT group received RRT within 6 hours of diagnosis of KDIGO stage 2; the standard treatment group was managed with RRT initiated within 8 hours of stage 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Guidelines suggest non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) be conveyed to cardiac arrest centres (CAC). We hypothesised that (a) a pre-hospital conveyance algorithm based on initial presenting rhythm following OHCA is feasible and (b) that would demonstrate survival advantage.

Methods: This observational pilot study included all consecutive patients with OHCA from suspected cardiac aetiology from the county of Essex, United Kingdom from April 2022-April 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: It remains unknown whether outcomes of the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3 (PARTNER 3) and Evolut Low Risk trials are comparable with surgical outcomes in nontrial settings, considering the added risk of concomitant cardiac operations.

Objective: To compare 30-day mortality and stroke incidences of patients in the surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) arm of low-risk trials with those of similar patients in the US Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD).

Design, Setting, And Participants: A cross-sectional sampling study was conducted of adults in the STS ACSD with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk for AVR who underwent SAVR during the years low-risk AVR trials (PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk) were enrolling (calendar years 2016-2018).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!