Objective: Anecdotal reports from imaging facilities globally suggest growing radiology interpretation reporting delays. This pilot study's primary aim was to estimate the backlog of formal interpretation of imaging examinations.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to radiologists globally to gather practice-specific characteristics, imaging volumes, and reporting for 3 types of examinations (brain/head CT scans, chest CT scans, and chest radiographs) at 4 time points: 7, 30, 90 days, and 6 months.

Results: We received responses from 49 radiologists in 16 countries on six continents. Unreported examinations (backlog) were present in thirty of 44 (68%) facilities. Backlogs for brain/head CT, chest CT, and chest radiographs were present in, respectively, 48%, 50%, and 59% of facilities at 7 days and 20%, 23%, and 32% of facilities at 6 months. When present, the mean proportion of backlog (range) at 7 days was 17% (1 to 96) for brain/head CT, 18% (3 to 82) for chest CT, and 22% (1 to 99) for chest radiographs.

Conclusions: Our findings from this pilot study show a widespread global backlog in reporting common imaging examinations, and further research is needed on the issue and contributing factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110049DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

formal interpretation
8
scans chest
8
chest radiographs
8
chest
6
backlogs formal
4
interpretation radiology
4
examinations
4
radiology examinations
4
examinations pilot
4
pilot global
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!