Purpose: The aim of the study was to use cadaveric models to assess the effect of loading the forearm muscles in different forearm rotations, with or without disruption to the stabilizing components, on the intra-articular pressure of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

Methods: Ten forearms with no severe osteoarthritis or injury to the DRUJ stabilizers were used. They were placed in a vertical support, and pressure sensors measured pressure within the DRUJ in 5 forearm rotations (neutral, pronation, supination, extension, and flexion) under the following 6 conditions: 1) no loading; 2) loading (at 1/5 of the load per cross-sectional area) with no disruption; 3) loading with disruption of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC); 4) loading with disruption of the TFCC and ulnar ligaments (ULs); 5) loading with disruption of the TFCC, ULs and interosseous membrane (IM); and 6) loading with disruption of the TFCC, ULs, IM, and pronator quadratus (PQ).

Results: Under the no disruption-no load, no disruption-loaded, and disrupted TFCC conditions, the highest intra-articular pressures were recorded in supination. Compared with the no-load condition, pressure was greater in the no disruption-loaded condition with a mean difference (MD) of 1.57 kg/cm in a neutral position. In flexion, pressure was greater with a disrupted TFCC (MD, 4.3 kg/cm). In supination, pressure was only greater with a disrupted TFCC (MD, 3.3 kg/cm), and pressure decreased in the other disruption conditions. The pressures recorded did not differ from the no disruption-no load condition in pronation or extension.

Conclusions: Pressures within the DRUJ changed with forearm rotations. In the no disruption-no load, no disruption-loaded, and disrupted TFCC conditions, intra-articular pressure was highest in supination. In flexion and supination with load and disruption of stabilizers, intra-articular pressure only increased significantly in the disrupted TFCC condition compared with no load.

Clinical Relevance: Based on our findings, exercises in supination should be avoided during the first phase of rehabilitation of TFCC injuries given the increased pressure on the DRUJ.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.11.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disrupted tfcc
20
intra-articular pressure
16
loading disruption
16
forearm rotations
12
disruption tfcc
12
disruption-no load
12
pressure greater
12
pressure
10
tfcc
10
pressure distal
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study compared the biomechanical stability of transosseous repair and transosseous combined with capsular repair techniques to reattach the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radioulnar joint instability.

Methods: Eight adult cadaveric upper-extremity specimens were studied. Each underwent peripheral ulnar-sided detachment of the deep and superficial TFCC fibers and repair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is supported by an array of dynamic and static stabilizers, of which the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is the most important, and the distal interosseous ligament is next in importance. The distal oblique band (DOB) is an identifiable component of the distal interosseous ligament, found in a subset of the population. Our objective was to determine the contribution of the DOB to DRUJ stability in the presence of a disrupted TFCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 Traumatic disruption of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is commonly present in various wrist traumas. A variation of surgical techniques is previously developed for different injury patterns. To our knowledge, only a few studies have investigated the fixation of combined foveal and capsular TFCC injuries using the ulnar tunnel technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The aim of the study was to use cadaveric models to assess the effect of loading the forearm muscles in different forearm rotations, with or without disruption to the stabilizing components, on the intra-articular pressure of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

Methods: Ten forearms with no severe osteoarthritis or injury to the DRUJ stabilizers were used. They were placed in a vertical support, and pressure sensors measured pressure within the DRUJ in 5 forearm rotations (neutral, pronation, supination, extension, and flexion) under the following 6 conditions: 1) no loading; 2) loading (at 1/5 of the load per cross-sectional area) with no disruption; 3) loading with disruption of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC); 4) loading with disruption of the TFCC and ulnar ligaments (ULs); 5) loading with disruption of the TFCC, ULs and interosseous membrane (IM); and 6) loading with disruption of the TFCC, ULs, IM, and pronator quadratus (PQ).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!