AI Article Synopsis

  • Malnutrition in older patients is a significant issue that can lead to serious health problems, and this study evaluated a tailored nutritional treatment for hospital patients.
  • The research involved 156 malnourished patients receiving individualized care compared to 73 patients receiving standard treatment, with follow-ups at 3 and 6 months.
  • Results showed no significant difference in health outcomes during hospitalization, but the control group had better post-discharge results, suggesting that the optimized nutritional intervention may not have been more effective than the already high-quality standard care provided.

Article Abstract

Malnutrition is a prevalent geriatric syndrome with adverse health outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an optimized protocol for treatment of malnutrition in older hospitalized patients. We conducted a prospective, non-randomized cluster-controlled study with 156 malnourished patients in the intervention and 73 in the control group, determined using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short-Form. The intervention group received individualized nutritional care, including electrolyte and micronutrients monitoring, while the control received standard care. We primarily focused on complications such as infections, falls, unplanned hospital readmissions, and mortality, and secondarily focused on functional status and mobility improvements. Post-discharge follow-ups occurred at 3 and 6 months. Our findings demonstrated that the intervention group (age 82.3 ± 7.5 y, 69% female), exhibited greater previous weight loss (11.5 kg vs. 4.7 kg), more cognitive impairment and a longer hospital stay (19 days vs. 15 days). Binary logistic regression showed no difference in primary endpoint outcomes between groups during hospitalization. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the control group exhibited fewer adverse outcomes, particularly falls and readmissions. Both groups showed in-hospital functional improvements, but only controls maintained post-discharge mobility gains. The study concludes that the nutritional intervention did not outperform standard care, potentially due to study limitations and high-quality standard care in control group geriatric departments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10707595PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

standard care
16
control group
12
older hospitalized
8
hospitalized patients
8
prospective non-randomized
8
non-randomized cluster-controlled
8
cluster-controlled study
8
intervention group
8
care
6
study
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!