Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of sewage sludge is used to biodegrade sewage sludge into biomethane and digestate. With the addition of thermal processes such as thermal hydrolysis (TH) and wet oxidation (WO), AD biodegradability generally improves. Implementation of additional treatment is challenging due to the limitation in the mass and energy balances. Hence, tools such as process simulation can be utilized to predict the input and output around the process. In addition, an economic analysis needs to be conducted to check the economic feasibility. The techno-economic analysis (TEA), an integrated method to evaluate a process scheme through simulation and subsequent economic analysis, is effective in providing a systematic understanding of economic implications and the feasibility of a process by identifying the bottlenecks and uncertainties that have a significant impact on the technology. TEA of AD, especially incorporating the TH or WO using gravity pressure vessel (GPV) technology, is limited in the literature. A comprehensive TEA of the AD and the pre- and post-treatment schemes can be utilized to determine the most feasible pathway for sludge treatment for implementation in the wastewater industry. In this study, TEA for four different scenarios of AD was conducted using Aspen Plus and economic analysis tools: (1) without any pre- or post-treatment, (2) with TH pre-treatment, (3) with 100 % WO post-treatment, and (4) with 20 % partial wet oxidation (PWO) and acid hydrolysis pre- or post-treatment. A simulation model (GPVM) was developed using Aspen Plus to mimic the GPV reactor. The study outcomes showed that Scenario 3 with 100 % WO post-treatment was the most suitable for processing parameters and sludge treatment cost. The sensitivity analysis concluded that operating cost and plant capacity are the dominant factors that impact the plant feasibility significantly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169024 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!