A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Two-dimensional CsPbI/CsPbBr vertical heterostructure: a potential photovoltaic absorber. | LitMetric

First-principles methods have been employed here to calculate structural, electronic and optical properties of CsPbI and CsPbBr, in monolayer and heterostructure (HS) (PbI-CsBr (HS1), CsI-CsBr (HS2), CsI-PbBr (HS3) and PbI-PbBr (HS4)) configurations. Imaginary frequencies are absent in phonon dispersion curves of CsPbI and CsPbBr monolayers which depicts their dynamical stability. Values of interfacial binding energies signifies stability of our simulated heterostructures. The CsPbI monolayer, CsPbBr monolayer, HS1, HS2, HS3 and HS4 possess direct bandgap of 2.19 eV, 2.73 eV, 2.41 eV, 2.11 eV, 1.88 eV and 2.07 eV, respectively. In the HS3, interface interactions between its constituent monolayers causes substantial decrease in its resultant bandgap which suggests its solar cell applications. Static dielectric constants of all simulated heterostructures are higher when compared to those of pristine monolayers which demonstrates that these heterostructures possess low charge carrier recombination rate. In optical absorption plots of materials, the plot of HS3 displayed a red shift and depicted absorption of a substantial part of visible spectrum. Later on, via Shockley-Queisser limit we have calculated solar cell parameters of all the reported structures. The calculations showed that HS2, HS3 and HS4 showcased enhanced power conversion efficiency compared to CsPbI and CsPbBr monolayers when utilized as an absorber layer in solar cells.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10700334PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48753-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cspbi cspbbr
12
cspbbr monolayer
8
cspbbr monolayers
8
simulated heterostructures
8
hs2 hs3
8
hs3 hs4
8
solar cell
8
hs3
5
two-dimensional cspbi/cspbbr
4
cspbi/cspbbr vertical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!