Objective: This double-blind, split mouth randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the clinical performance of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CBUq) universal adhesive under different application times (no waiting and waiting) compared to Clearfil SE Bond adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over 18 months.
Methods: One hundred and eighty-three restorations were distributed randomly into three groups based on the adhesive system and waiting time: CUBq without waiting time (CUBq-NW), CUBq with a 20 s waiting time (CUBq-W), and CSE with a 20 s waiting time. After placement, restorations were evaluated after 18 months using the International Dental Federation (FDI) and United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses involved Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance and Wilcoxon tests, with a significance level set at 5 %.
Results: Over the 18-month period, no restorations were lost across the tested groups. Marginal adaptation evaluation indicated minor discrepancies in 21 restorations (8 CUBq-NW, 6 CUBq-W, and 7 CSE). There were no significant differences observed among the three groups following the 18-month clinical assessment (p > 0.05). Only two restorations showed marginal discoloration after 18 months (1 CUBq-NW and 1 CSE).
Conclusions: The application of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick using either the "waiting" or "no-waiting" technique exhibited excellent clinical results in NCCLs during the 18-month follow-up period, demonstrating comparable performance to Clearfil SE Bond in all assessed outcomes.
Clinical Significance: The findings suggest that the new universal adhesive applied using the no-waiting technique demonstrates promising clinical performance when compared to conventional application methods.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifer RBR-69p7mpr.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104800 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Prioritizing Patients from the Most Deprived Areas on Elective Waiting Lists in the NHS in England: Estimating the Health and Health Inequality Impact.
MDM Policy Pract
January 2025
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Unlabelled: Reducing hospital waiting lists for elective procedures is a policy concern in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Following growth in waiting lists after COVID-19, the NHS published an elective recovery plan that includes an aim to prioritize patients from deprived areas. We use a previously developed model to estimate the health and health inequality impact under hypothetical targeted versus universal policies to reduce waiting time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChild mental health problems and poverty.
BJPsych Bull
January 2025
King's College London, London, UK.
Waiting lists for children and young people with mental health problems are at an all-time high. Almost the only policies proposed to deal with this situation involve increasing the number of mental health professionals. Little attention is given to dealing with the underlying causative stresses, of which poverty is easily the most pervasive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTracheostomy as a Management Option After Listing for Pediatric Cardiac Transplantation.
Pediatr Transplant
February 2025
Paediatric Intensive Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Background: Children with end-stage heart failure listed for cardiac transplantation may require mechanical ventilation and/or circulatory support whilst awaiting transplantation. A subgroup of these patients is unable to wean off mechanical ventilator support and undergo tracheostomy to enhance quality of life and allow de-escalation of intensive care. There is limited evidence of the use of tracheostomy associated with pediatric cardiac transplantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatric Age-Prioritized Waitlisting Policy Potentially Disadvantages Adolescents on Dialysis Not Listed for Transplant Until Adulthood.
Pediatr Transplant
February 2025
Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background: Current kidney transplant (KT) policies offer advantages in waiting time and organ allocation priority to pediatric patients waitlisted before 18 years old. This study evaluates the effects of this policy for patients who are on dialysis before, but not waitlisted until after, age 18.
Methods: Patients aged 11-25 years and waitlisted between 2001 and 2022 for KT were identified in the OPTN STAR data file for analysis.
[What should be considered in the case of previous operations or injections prior to hip and knee replacement?].
Orthopadie (Heidelb)
January 2025
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Background: Patients who have had prior injections, surgeries such as arthroscopies, and have existing osteosynthetic implants in the hip and knee have an increased risk of periprosthetic infections when undergoing hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Osteosynthesis: For patients with osteosynthetic implants in the knee joint, a two-stage procedure (implant removal followed by TKA) is recommended based on the available literature and the high colonization rates. A two-stage procedure is also recommended for patients with hip implants.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!